Re: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- From: Jolyon Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:13:58 +1200
In article <48054f0a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
alexandre@f#ckspamconsultbrasil.com.br says...
Shame on you MS!
Should be shame on anyone that allowed themselves - as pre-cautioned in
the old saying - to be fooled twice.
I mean, c'mon.
"From the company that brought you DLL HELL.... the _ANSWER_ to DLL
HELL!!!!"
Seriously, it was obvious from the start that .NET would not ease this
pain, only ever mask it behind a _different_ pain.
Since this industry is famous for recyclying/rediscovering old new
ideas, I look forward in a few years to an announcement of a solution to
"Framework HELL".... I anticipate it will be something that involves
applications loading only specific, required libraries dynamically
rather than requiring an entire, (essentially) monolithic runtime
framework.
Dynamically Linked Libraries.... hmmm, catchy. Now if only we could find
a neat little acronym to call them by....
;)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- From: Mike Vance
- Re: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- From: Bruce McGee
- Re: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- From: Doychin Bondzhev
- Re: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- From: John Jacobson
- Re: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- References:
- Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- From: Alexandre Machado
- Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- Prev by Date: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- Next by Date: Re: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- Previous by thread: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- Next by thread: Re: Wonders of .NET framework and MS stuff
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|