Re: Private variables question
- From: "Bruce McGee" <bmcgee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2008 11:20:02 -0700
Tom Corey wrote:
Hmmm, that has a certain appeal. Especially in light of our 75,000
lines of
distinctly-procedural-despite-having-been-written-in-Delphi-spaghetti-
co de.
It struck me odd at first, but it saves me lots of grief. I run
CodeHealer (highly recommended) against all of my projects, especially
new ones that I'm taking over, and I was surprised to see how often
local variables hide things. Using a standard prefix avoids me having
to come up with some kind of meaningful-yet-different local variable
name.
/rant narrowly averted
I might join you in that rant.
--
Regards,
Bruce McGee
Glooscap Software
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Private variables question
- From: Tom Corey
- Re: Private variables question
- References:
- Private variables question
- From: Phill Harvey-Smith
- Re: Private variables question
- From: Bruce McGee
- Re: Private variables question
- From: Tom Corey
- Private variables question
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Delphi for Win32 still mainstream?
- Next by Date: Re: Is Delphi for Win32 still mainstream?
- Previous by thread: Re: Private variables question
- Next by thread: Re: Private variables question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|