Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: Jolyon Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 08:16:08 +1200
In article <4822750c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
davidn.cgng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
Jolyon Smith wrote:
Just remember who sold them at that value.
Not entirely clear what you are getting at there. It takes two to
agree a deal.
Sure, but if the seller has apparently undersold, whose fault is that?
Well I wasn't looking to apportion "fault" to anyone, just interpreting
a few things from a key property of the deal - i.e. the price.
And when selling something that is (seemingly)
difficult to sell (for whatever reason) the buyer is usually the one
in the driving seat.
What indications were there that it was difficult to sell, at the point
of being sold? That's bearing in mind that failure to find an investor
before the split is ancient history.
So the fact that it took two years (or more?) to sell isn't any
indication that it was difficult to sell?
2 years is not ancient history, especially when there was no break in
the timeline. CodeGear has been "for sale" since day one, and was for
sale as the DTG before that.
Why is it bonkers, and which perspective, exactly? The direction Delphi
is/should be heading in?
Direction? What direction? The one laid out in the ET Product Managers
blog on this acquisition? Where-in he offers the view that database
application development is something new!?!
That is arguably a valid position for the likes of Java/PHP/Ruby et al
where databases are - or could be said to be - becoming more important
in the web space, but Delphi has ALWAYS been about database development.
Does that make a database tools company a good fit? Or rather, a good
HOME for Delphi?
I don't see that it does. As a Delphi developer I might see a need to
buy a few ET products to use alongside Delphi (well, if it weren't for
the fact that I have used ER/Studio before and, well, let's just say it
didn't last long and I don't anymore), but the fact that those products
are not already tightly integrated and/or offering integrated solutions
for Delphi makes them just one of any number of possible alternatives I
might consider.
If CG had acquired ET and put Delphi specific versions in the box that
might have made sense, but they could have done that simply by
partnering - an acquisition (either way) wouldn't have been necessary.
But then CG also have a bunch of more specifically database oriented
technologies themselves, oh, and a Java product line.
All of which DO make perfect sense and could be seen as having a home at
a database tools company.
It would be bonkers only if Embarcadero
changed that direction significantly, and it has already been said that
there are no such plans to do so.
A cynic might observe that bringing something to a dead halt isn't a
change in direction.
;)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- References:
- Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: Nick Hodges (CodeGear)
- Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: David Erbas-White
- Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: Tom Corey
- Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: David Erbas-White
- Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- Prev by Date: Re: Codegear sold : For how many U.S. dollars was sold ?
- Next by Date: Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- Previous by thread: Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- Next by thread: Re: Embarcadero's Director of Product's Blog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|