A letter to Microsoft
- From: sysrpl <sysrpl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:21:11 -0400
With all the negative opinions floating around lately about Vista and WPF (on the channel 9 forums), I (being a Delphi user) have been quite pissed about the current "state of affairs" of the Windows programming community. I still believe native code and Delphi are where it's at, but both Borland and Microsoft seem to be doing everything in their power to kill the community.
Microsoft killed their most loyal developers with the release of Visual Fred and then took a seven year hiatus before dumping the Vista turd on everyone's doorstep.
Borland on the other hand has slowly allowed itself to crumble, continually losing their best talent to other companies, while stupidly mistreating the best the developer community had to offer (Hello Peter Morris and Ray Lischner if you're reading this).
We've all had plenty of time to ponder the problems, and this thread isn't going to solve anything, but I just wanted to given one last push to revitalize my (hopefully our) interest in programming for Windows.
That said, here is my feature request to Microsoft ...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Microsoft,
GDI+ is a complete failure. It is slow, uses software rendering (please don't mention Matrox, they aren't an option in 2008), and doesn't have an officially supported C interface.
Video here: http://youtube.com/watch?v=2ceiKZyGEHE
Microsoft, as per the video above, please get serious and create a new hardware abstraction API for drawing graphics to replace the ancient GDI. Put it into the Platform SDK as a C interface and create some .NET wrappers for it. Use every means at your disposal to make damn sure hardware vendors provide accelerated drivers for it.
I know what you're going to say ... we've done that twice already (GDI+ and WPF) with the last two shipments of Windows, so the answer is NO!
Well sadly, in my opinion again, WPF is not the answer. Microsoft you missed the mark twice now. While .NET might be well suited for enterprise development, it is not a real choice for commercial software. Commercial applications (all of the many programs I depend on everyday such as Office, Photoshop, AutoCAD, Lightwave, Firefox, Textpad, and I could go on and on) are and will remain in the C/C++ realm. This goes doubly so for intensive graphics applications.
So unto WPF. WPF needlessly ties graphics programming to a tree model, where everything to be drawn is an object and added must be added to some kind of drawing surface collection. It's unintuitive, and step in the wrong direction.
I want a programming model which has been proven over time and has worked work well in the past. I expect a C style graphics API in the vein of ...
Surface.Line(Pen, 10.5, 23.25);
Rather than ...
Line.Stroke = Pen;
Line.StrokeThickness = 2;
Line.X1 = 0;
Line.Y1 = 0;
Line.X2 = 10.5;
Line.X2 = 23.25;
Surface.Add(Line);
What we need is more advanced hardware blitting with blend modes, direct access to graphics memory, fast and smooth hardware interpolation of image, stroke, and fill resizing with antiailising done in hardware. We want layered graphics output, hardware transforms, and polygon clipping with spline curves as polygon segments while preserving strokes and fills.
We don't need a high level markup interface to putting pixels on the screen. Leave the markup in a control, not in the API.
Microsoft, please give us a new solid graphics API and make sure hardware manufacturers support it this time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A letter to Microsoft
- From: GrandmasterB
- Re: A letter to Microsoft
- From: David Berneda
- Re: A letter to Microsoft
- From: Andre Kaufmann
- Re: A letter to Microsoft
- From: Per Larsen
- Re: A letter to Microsoft
- From: Yogi Yang 007
- Re: A letter to Microsoft
- From: Craig
- Re: A letter to Microsoft
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: A letter to Microsoft
- Prev by Date: Re: BLS - Was CG revenues have dropped!
- Next by Date: Re: Porting Delphi Project to UNIX Platform.
- Previous by thread: flex and data
- Next by thread: Re: A letter to Microsoft
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|