Re: Delphi refocussing on .Net - good or bad?
- From: "Nathanial Woolls" <nwoolls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:01:59 -0400
Why would anyone choose Delphi for .NET over Visual Studio
Why did you quote this, and cut out the rest of the exact same sentence?
"and Oxygene for Pascal if you are adverse to learning C#"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygene_(programming_language)
That pretty much addresses the rest of your post, aside from an embedded IDE which is something one can get used to with time. YMMV, but I'd take all of the options for available technologies, third-party controls, frameworks, etc, and learn live with an embedded IDE.
How about that?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delphi refocussing on .Net - good or bad?
- From: Mark Tiede
- Re: Delphi refocussing on .Net - good or bad?
- References:
- Delphi refocussing on .Net - good or bad?
- From: Kjell Rilbe
- Re: Delphi refocussing on .Net - good or bad?
- From: Nathanial Woolls
- Re: Delphi refocussing on .Net - good or bad?
- From: Mark Tiede
- Delphi refocussing on .Net - good or bad?
- Prev by Date: Re: Search for word or phrase in .pas & .dfm files
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: About error handling - WAS: Re: A remobjects wtf...
- Previous by thread: Re: Delphi refocussing on .Net - good or bad?
- Next by thread: Re: Delphi refocussing on .Net - good or bad?
- Index(es):