Re: Opinions needed about the best "Middleware suite" kbmMW vs. RO\DA
From: Luke Miller (lmiller_at_rescorsoft.com)
Date: 11/18/03
- Next message: Kevin Boylan: "Re: Abbrevia Replacement - Fastest Zip Component?"
- Previous message: Ed Dressel: "Re: Opinions needed about the best "Middleware suite" kbmMW vs. RO\DA"
- In reply to: Alessandro Federici: "Re: Opinions needed about the best "Middleware suite" kbmMW vs. RO\DA"
- Next in thread: Alessandro Federici: "Re: Opinions needed about the best "Middleware suite" kbmMW vs. RO\DA"
- Reply: Alessandro Federici: "Re: Opinions needed about the best "Middleware suite" kbmMW vs. RO\DA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:02:53 -0500
Slightly off-topic but it would be great if we could get those
articles/whitepapers as PDF's. Just a suggestion.
Luke
"Alessandro Federici" <nomore@spam.forme> wrote in message
news:3fb902d8$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> "Sol Brown" <test@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3fb8fa0d$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> [..]
>
> > 1. Cross-db option that both offer, so which framework is better suited
> for
> > this?.
>
> Data Abstract articles can be found at:
>
>
http://www.remobjects.com/articlecategories.asp?id=D68A44BB-08A7-4817-9EE6-AE3B40994554
>
> Those that answers this question best are "DA03 - Introduction to Schemas"
> and "DA08 - DA08 - No-Code n-Tier Applications with Data Abstract ".
>
> Pay close attention to the macro processors (see the big "tip" towards the
> end in DA08) and the fact you could also work having two databases that
are
> different in structure (DA03). We have a demo working against MSSQL
> Northwind and Interbase Employee.gdb
>
> > 2. I'm trying to figure out if those framework would give any boost to
> > performance for say an enviroment of about 20-30 users, since my app is
> > already using Chached Updates. (I guess the answer for that would be
"just
> > try it yourself", but its hard for me, since those users are not in my
> > personal network, they are just clients using my app)
>
> That probabily depends on on how you code your application and what
database
> you use more than anything else.
> I need more information to answer this question more precisely.
>
> > 3. I'm making heavy use of identity fields of sql server, they serve as
my
> > primary field, would they get refreshed when record gets posted to the
> > server?.
>
> We have samples that show how that can be done in two ways.
>
> > 4[..] I would like to
> > know if there is an official implementation for this, as well as
> "Cascading
> > updates" like ado.net, and cascading delete, so if you delete a master
> > record it deletes all detail records, and of course when you apply the
> > updates to the database, it deletes first the detail records then the
> master
> > ones?
>
> I am not sure why you wouldn't want to have the posted in one transaction,
> but regardless you have control of that if you want it. Our data tables
have
> properties that allow you to control how cascade deletes and updates work.
> You can have all the details deleted automatically if your master is
delete
> (no code, just set a property) and you can decide to send deltas in one
> delta or using individual deltas whenever you decide it's time. It's very
> similar to the ADO.Net dataset.
>
> > 5. How do they work with calculated?. well, one of the main purposes of
> > n-tier is (noted on kbmMW's site) is that you have all your bussiness
> logic
> > on the middle tier, so it could be used with diffrent types of clients.
> how
> > does this apply to calculated fields, that should be calculated on
client.
> [..]
>
> We have client side and server side calculated fields.
>
> > 6. What about if you have diffrent sql for insert/update/delete/refresh,
> > which I make heavy use of in sdac?, are you able to use (if you want)
and
> > default sql, where the it autamaticly creates the sql (for
> > update/delete/refresh) at run-time, and of course when you want to put
> your
> > own sql you could. Or for each update/delete you have to enter in
> manually?.
>
> You have *total* control on this. Refer again to the schema article.
> You can have SQL automatically generated or choose to use your own
> statements (which can either use stored procedures or plain SQL). This was
> the first goal of our schema-based architecture.
>
> > 7. What about when you do some update to the database on a record, could
> you
> > supply some additional sql's that should run when you do database
updates,
> > for instance when you create an invoice, and you want to update the
> > inventory table, could you do it in one sql (like a sql scripts), which
is
> > how how do it in sdac.
>
> You can do that by using the events in our Business Processor component.
> After you process an update OR a whole set of updates, you can then fire
> additional commands to perform addidional tasks.
>
> > 8. This is my main concern, one of my main goals of going to n-tier, is
to
> > have a centrilized place of placing, all business logic as well as my
> > formating (attributes) of my fields, like caption, alignment, size ect.,
> > well my main question is about the "formating part", how does this
> happen?, [..]
>
> Our schemas allow you to set all that information and, in top of that, you
> can also use our Data Dictionary to share field attributes reused accross
> many datasets. For example, imagine you have an field called PhoneNum
which
> should have a DisplayLabel of "Phone Number" and it is used in 20
datasets.
> What you would do is create an attribute set in the Data Dictionary and
then
> associate that to the fields in the various Schema datasets.
> Our fields also support regular expressions.
>
> See more about this in the paragraph "Data Dictionary" in the article DA03
>
> > Sorry for this lengthy message, but this is actually want to know, if
both
> > or any of those frameworks offer those stuff.
> > Thank so much for you help
>
> We support all that and a lot more.
> Check the article DA04 and DA06 to see something really unique to boost
your
> productivity and "style".
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alessandro Federici
>
> RemObjects Software, Inc.
> http://www.remobjects.com
>
>
>
>
- Next message: Kevin Boylan: "Re: Abbrevia Replacement - Fastest Zip Component?"
- Previous message: Ed Dressel: "Re: Opinions needed about the best "Middleware suite" kbmMW vs. RO\DA"
- In reply to: Alessandro Federici: "Re: Opinions needed about the best "Middleware suite" kbmMW vs. RO\DA"
- Next in thread: Alessandro Federici: "Re: Opinions needed about the best "Middleware suite" kbmMW vs. RO\DA"
- Reply: Alessandro Federici: "Re: Opinions needed about the best "Middleware suite" kbmMW vs. RO\DA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|