Re: Remobjects v KBM

From: Lauchlan M (LMackinnon_at_NOSPAMHotmail.com)
Date: 02/20/04 

Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:20:16 +1000

> It would be nice to have some detailed, "non-partisan"
> evaluations available in the community. A lot's changed
> in last year.
>
> Lauchlin's post was good start, IMO.

Thanks!

> the license, it's capabilities and other things. Christ,
> it's free, well supported and from very beginning bugs get
> fixed fast.

Just to clarify for kbmmw, kbmmw in its commercial version is not free, but
is rather cheap. It also has a more limited freeware version that is
available under a special licence to qualifying groups (eg non-profit
organisations etc).

Lauchlan M

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Remobjects v KBM
    ... >> evaluations available in the community. ... >> Lauchlin's post was good start, IMO. ... > Just to clarify for kbmmw, kbmmw in its commercial version is not ... For the life of me can't figure out why the pot shots @ Kim, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)
  • Re: Remobjects v KBM
    ... IMO, I would go SOAP simply because it's more widely ... Although KBMMW has the ability to integrate Java code, ... kbmMW's XML support is custom built, not based on any 3rdparty DLL's, and is ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)