Re: Recommendation
From: Exorcist (dsf)
Date: 05/29/04
- Next message: Stefan Paege: "Re: Recommendation"
- Previous message: Nils Haeck: "Re: Recommendation"
- In reply to: Lee: "Re: Recommendation"
- Next in thread: Andrew: "Re: Recommendation"
- Reply: Andrew: "Re: Recommendation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 18:23:57 +0200
I have one indy server and in each thread of server i create one session in
nexusdb (one session per for table).
Each thread (indy server thread) has 10 tables and theres max 100 users
threads.
I have used dbisam and easytable and flashfiler too, and nexusdb seems
fastest.
So i have own protocol for writing and deleting data.
I dont know if its good idea since i have simple protocol and hundred of
users changing few records each minute.
"Lee" <lee_jenkins@No_Spamming_datatrakpos.com> wrote in message
news:40b8b4eb$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> From what I've read, FB embedded supports only one (exclusive?)
connection.
> In addition, shouldn't you use a separate connection for each thread in a
> threaded app? Of course, FB server would handle it quite well and its
very
> easy to deploy. We do it all the time.
>
> Warm Regards,
>
> Lee
>
>
> "Exorcist" <dsf> wrote in message news:40b8b40d@newsgroups.borland.com...
> > I have project in d7 with trial nexusdb.
> > 30-40 tables, 100 users (in own thread) etc.
> > is there any free replacement for this Nexusdb (embeded),
> > for example firebird.
> > What to use with firebird ?
> > Or theres some other fast db???
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Stefan Paege: "Re: Recommendation"
- Previous message: Nils Haeck: "Re: Recommendation"
- In reply to: Lee: "Re: Recommendation"
- Next in thread: Andrew: "Re: Recommendation"
- Reply: Andrew: "Re: Recommendation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]