Re: Software testing
From: AutomatedQA - Robert Leahey (robertl_at_automatedqa.com)
Date: 10/22/04
- Previous message: Ivo Bauer: "Re: tool for translating bidi to latin"
- In reply to: Jonathan Neve: "Software testing"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Neve: "Re: Software testing"
- Reply: Jonathan Neve: "Re: Software testing"
- Reply: Steve Troxell: "Re: Software testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:19:12 -0500
Hi Jonathan,
If you do check out TestComplete
(http://www.automatedqa.com/products/tc.asp) as Steve mentioned, you'll want
to pay attention to our ADO plug-in. (see the help, but basically our ADO
object will give you access to either the 3 standard MS ADO objects, or the
6 Borland-style ADO objects.) From there, you can automate database
population and verification. i.e., you can populate a DB with testing data,
and you can bypass your client app entirely, having TestComplete talk to
your DB directly, verifying the records there.
As for the cases you mentioned (GUI validation), this is very
straight-forward with TestComplete. Check out the demos and the Getting
Started texts for info on how to do this sort of checking. Feel free to send
me questions or post to our newsgroups directly at forums.automatedqa.com.
For the extended cases you mention, you'll want to check out the concepts of
data-driven and object-driven testing.
Good luck,
-- Robert Leahey www.automatedqa.com AutomatedQA "Jonathan Neve" <jonathan@!nospam!microtec.fr> wrote in message news:4177eedd@newsgroups.borland.com... > Hi everyone, > > I'm looking for a tool that will in some way facilitate / automate > functionnal application testing. What would be your suggestions? What I > really need is something that can understand something of the buisness > logic, and make sure everything works as designed. > > I work in the realm of database application programming, so unit testing > is to me of limited use. It's not so much the procedures, functions and > classes I need to test, as the actual outcome, the GUI, etc. If a label is > too short to display all the data, this is a bug. If a grid contains > erroneous data, or lacks data, this is a bug. It's not just a matter of > error messages (since this is usually the easiest kind of bug to detect). > > What I need, is a tool in which one can define all the buisness logic of > the application, telling it exactly what should happen in each situation, > and that can then try out every combination, in random order, a random > number of times, coming at each problem from every possible angle, etc. > > What would you suggest? Is there a tool that at least comes close to my > above specifications? > > Thanks! > Jonathan Neve.
- Previous message: Ivo Bauer: "Re: tool for translating bidi to latin"
- In reply to: Jonathan Neve: "Software testing"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Neve: "Re: Software testing"
- Reply: Jonathan Neve: "Re: Software testing"
- Reply: Steve Troxell: "Re: Software testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|