Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- From: "Robert" <ngsemail2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 08:38:34 -0400
"Lauchlan M" <LMackinnonAT_NoSpam_ozemailDOTcomDOTau> wrote in message
news:428fd32d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> So what's the reasonable price to jump to? $25,000 for Enterprise
customers
> who want to use a name brand db server?
>
Times two or three, at least. Do a quick runup of the marketing and support
costs that you outlined. Never mind development costs.
Robert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- From: Lauchlan M
- Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- References:
- Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- From: Andrea Raimondi
- Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- From: Matthew Jones
- Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- From: Lauchlan M
- Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- Prev by Date: Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- Next by Date: Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- Previous by thread: Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- Next by thread: Re: Best database(different from the usual "profile")
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|