Re: Graphics 32 in D2005 PE

OBones wrote:

> in which the xmlrtl package is missing for no obvious reason.

The reason is very obvious: xmlrtl is only available for Professional and
more advanced SKUs. But the problem with the Personal Edition is that the
new designide package requires xmlrtl.dcp. So if you want to compile a
package that requires the designide package the compiler will look for
xmlrtl.dcp which does not exist (for an obvious reason).


--
Regards,

Andreas Hausladen
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Operation can be dispatching in only one type
    ... Plaintext_Documents package, ... I don't see a practical reason why that would be necessary. ... three of those teams decide to use this library package and derives ... to figure out at compile time whether something will go wrong. ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: packages revisited
    ... you want to add to the general CL reader. ... I see no reason for not doing that. ... it in every package we are "in". ... If there is no such symbol, it is interned to:a-package ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Shipping in eBay
    ... >>> a good reason to not do so. ... >>> away from my job, kids, wife, etc. to mail this package to another ... No access to USPS? ... transaction online and the postman will pick up your package at your ...
    (rec.models.scale)
  • Re: packages, load paths and environment variables
    ... There is one reason. ... you only need the package definition of the first (you only ... Therefore when you have CL sources with crossed dependencies, ... and add a in the sources (implementation module) of A. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: OCD programmers and backwards compatibility :-).
    ... upgrading rpms forever with individual packages being released, ... I can tell the only reason was a bunch of OCD programmers who broke ... stop checking in non-backward compatible changes without fantastically ... the foobar package play nice with the rest of the release. ...
    (Fedora)