Re: Best versioning software for small teams
- From: Bill Mogk <wmogk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:11:04 -0500
Roger Lascelles wrote:
{snip}
I have not found bugs, but some of the subversion concepts are not *totally*
explained and Tortoise can let you confuse yourself. From memory, stuff
like add a file then delete it without a commit in between can leave you
confused, but no harm done. Start off gently and it will come to you.
I find creating a new project kind of weird, but I am used to it now. After you import an existing project, you cannot check out to the same location. So, I rename the original working directory, and then do a checkout. I guess SVN is just forcing me to be cautious.
The other ting that took me a while to figure out is that for day-to-day use the SVN's log is more useful than the repo-browser. I first thought that the log was just a "dumb" dump of activity and the Repo-browser was where you went to see changes. In reality, selecting a file in tortoise, right-clicking and selecting the log menu item, gives a complete history of that files changes. And you can do a diff using your favourite file comparer.
Roger Lascelles
Bill
.
- References:
- Best versioning software for small teams
- From: Jonathan Neve[Microtec]
- Re: Best versioning software for small teams
- From: Gerrit Beuze
- Re: Best versioning software for small teams
- From: Ed Dressel
- Re: Best versioning software for small teams
- From: Dean Hill
- Re: Best versioning software for small teams
- From: Roger Lascelles
- Best versioning software for small teams
- Prev by Date: Panel that resizes with padding to caption size
- Next by Date: Re: looking for best toolbar and menu
- Previous by thread: Re: Best versioning software for small teams
- Next by thread: Re: Best versioning software for small teams
- Index(es):