Re: little bug in uPSRuntime.pas
- From: Carlo Kok <ck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:28:33 +0200
SD wrote:
I know I missed a space there, but it's still valid Pascal.agreed, and it doesnt change the compiled code either.
So seem the only right way is to fix the ICARUS product.... ;)
However '0 then' is more readable than '0then' by my view point...
Oh I agree, and will fix it in Pascal Script when I get to it, I'm just
saying that it's valid Pascal.
--
Carlo Kok
.
- References:
- little bug in uPSRuntime.pas
- From: SD
- Re: little bug in uPSRuntime.pas
- From: Carlo Kok
- Re: little bug in uPSRuntime.pas
- From: Liz
- Re: little bug in uPSRuntime.pas
- From: SD
- little bug in uPSRuntime.pas
- Prev by Date: Re: Snap Object Dataset + Editor
- Next by Date: Re: RichEdit Component - Unlimited Character Line
- Previous by thread: Re: little bug in uPSRuntime.pas
- Next by thread: Quick report and multiple memos
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|