Re: ANN: RTC SDK 1.9g > New Message-based Third-party transports
- From: "Hannes Danzl[NDD]" <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 02:14:46 -0700
I have done some performance tests with client and server components in one
app (direct link, NexusDB Memory transport and NexusDB WinSock transport),
with extremely good results. I have to say, I was really amazed by how fast
NexusDB transports perform ... especially the WinSock NexusDB transport,
which uses blocking IOCP.
Performance gains when using NexusDB transports enormous and I'm starting to
think about adding a binary protocol for the RTC SDK, since you can't
achieve similar performance with a HTTP protocol. I knew that you can gain
some performance by using a well-defined binary protocol in blocking mode,
but seeing this in action was quite amazing.
even cooler. Thanks!!!
--
Hannes Danzl [NexusDB Developer]
Newsgroup archive at http://www.tamaracka.com/search.htm
.
- References:
- ANN: RTC SDK 1.9g > New Message-based Third-party transports
- From: Danijel Tkalcec
- Re: ANN: RTC SDK 1.9g > New Message-based Third-party transports
- From: Hannes Danzl[NDD]
- Re: ANN: RTC SDK 1.9g > New Message-based Third-party transports
- From: Danijel Tkalcec
- ANN: RTC SDK 1.9g > New Message-based Third-party transports
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC - Best free/Open-Source VCS
- Next by Date: Re: Delphi and GIS
- Previous by thread: Re: ANN: RTC SDK 1.9g > New Message-based Third-party transports
- Next by thread: Re: RTC SDK 1.9g > New Message-based Third-party transports
- Index(es):