Re: Robust Single File database - updated benchmark results
- From: "Hannes Danzl[NDD]" <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Jan 2007 16:25:22 -0800
Jerry Hayes wrote:
Here are the latest results with NexusDB and a correction:
Just a few notes about NexusDB and the benchmarks:
NexusDB supports both native Guids (binary) and VarChar columns. One of the
few, if not only, one in the list that does so.
That could have a major factor on database sizes.
Sure can have. NexusDB also supports an optional variable record size (which
is not used in this benchmark) which can reduce stored size significantly.
With the default static record engine all records are the same size on disk
and whether you use varchar() or char() won't make a difference size wise. The
only difference is that (conforming to the SQL standard) char() fields are
returned padded with spaces to the defined length.
--
Hannes Danzl [NexusDB Developer]
Newsgroup archive at http://www.tamaracka.com/search.htm
.
- References:
- Robust Single File database - updated benchmark results
- From: Ian Roberts
- Re: Robust Single File database - updated benchmark results
- From: Ian Roberts
- Re: Robust Single File database - updated benchmark results
- From: Hannes Danzl[NDD]
- Re: Robust Single File database - updated benchmark results
- From: Jerry Hayes
- Robust Single File database - updated benchmark results
- Prev by Date: Re: Curve fit routines
- Next by Date: Re: Looking for Version Control Software
- Previous by thread: Re: Robust Single File database - updated benchmark results
- Next by thread: Re: Robust Single File database - updated benchmark results
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|