Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- From: Tony Caduto <tony@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:59:28 -0600
Danijel Tkalcec [RTC] wrote:
If you were the owner of RTC Remote Tools copyrights, what would you do?
A) Find a team of enthusiasts and make it Open Source
B) Make a commercial product and stop selling the source code (price?)
C) Continue offering it as a commercial product with source code (price?)
E) Something else?
You should do what you originally said you where going to do and
release a nice true component set for the remote tools and make it
transport independent. I myself don't want to use RTC stuff because I have lots of time invested in blocking sockets using Synapse and Synapse has incredible support for SSL already built in, so why would I want to use RTC for the transport?
I would like to be able to drop a viewer component on a form and be able to setup my own remote control system for internal use and I would want
source code, it's just not nice not to include source. There should also be a server component that I could just instantiate or drop on a form and set some properties and events and be on my way.
I would gladly pay up to 299 for such a product for non commercial use i.e. not sell to the general public as a PC Anywhere clone.
You could then charge much more for the right to do that.
I might even be happy with the encoder/decoder library IF you had a decent example of how to use it.
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- From: Doug Olson
- Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- From: Danijel Tkalcec [RTC]
- Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- From: Dean Hill
- Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- From: edbored
- Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- References:
- POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- From: Danijel Tkalcec [RTC]
- POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- Prev by Date: Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- Next by Date: Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- Previous by thread: Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- Next by thread: Re: POLL: RTC Remote Tools 2.0
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|