Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: marc hoffman <foo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:19:48 +0100
Danijel,
my last public reply on this matter, just to set things straight:
I said I had no business with RO, but with Dmitry.
And Dmitry has been ignoring my E-Mails.
Well, Dmitry is part of RO now, for all you're concerned. Your emails to Dmitry have not been ignored, they have all been answered.
The fact that you didn't like who's name was in the From field doesn't give you the right to publicly claim your emails were "ignored". I know it really serves your story better, but that doesn't make it true.
Yours,
--
marc hoffman
RemObjects Software
The Infrastructure Company
http://www.remobjects.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: Danijel Tkalcec
- Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- References:
- ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: Kim Madsen
- Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: Q Correll
- Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: Shane Stump
- Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: Shloma Baum
- Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: Danijel Tkalcec
- Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: marc hoffman
- Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- From: Danijel Tkalcec
- ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- Prev by Date: Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- Next by Date: ANN: wxForms - 1.0.5 - wxWidgets Form Designer for C++ Builder
- Previous by thread: Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- Next by thread: Re: ANN: Cost effective ThinDAC replacement....
- Index(es):