Re: OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- From: "Bob Dawson" <DeleteThisAndUseMyInitials@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:51:21 -0600
"Robert Giesecke" wrote
but also a system, that uses his library.
I agree that, interpreted that way, such a license would tend to make a
product unusable, so I doubt it was what was meant.
Suppose for example that we had an embedded database product. I'd think it
completely legitimate to offer a specific program (for example a recipe
program) architected in such a way that the database access was actually
abstracted through a dll, but not legimate to sell a general purpose
database dll, based on the vendor's code, as a competing product.
bobD
.
- References:
- OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- From: Danijel Tkalcec
- Re: OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- From: Robert Giesecke
- Re: OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- From: Robert Giesecke
- OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Ethics, Morale and Intellectual Property - open discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|