Re: a synchronization issue - jusy for you guys
From: Martin Harvey (Demon Account) (martin_at__nospam_pergolesi.demon.co.uk)
Date: 06/16/04
- Previous message: Martin Harvey (Demon Account): "Re: a synchronization issue - jusy for you guys"
- In reply to: David Reeve: "Re: a synchronization issue - jusy for you guys"
- Next in thread: David Reeve: "Re: a synchronization issue - jusy for you guys"
- Reply: David Reeve: "Re: a synchronization issue - jusy for you guys"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:31:36 +0100
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 01:19:36 GMT, "David Reeve"
<dree4456@big-pond.net.au> wrote:
>Nice example of a pragmatic fix that 'solves' the immediate problem by
>reducing the incidence of thread conflict to an unnoticeable level.
Yet another programmer falls into the land of fear uncertainty and
doubt caused by multiprocessing. Muahahahah!
BTW - I had fun today - ran a kernel debugger, and did some driver
debugging in the windows XP kernel space. V.interesting. more like
debugging embedded boxen.
MH.
- Previous message: Martin Harvey (Demon Account): "Re: a synchronization issue - jusy for you guys"
- In reply to: David Reeve: "Re: a synchronization issue - jusy for you guys"
- Next in thread: David Reeve: "Re: a synchronization issue - jusy for you guys"
- Reply: David Reeve: "Re: a synchronization issue - jusy for you guys"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|