Re: DLL with BPC 7.0

From: J French (erewhon_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 07/26/04 

Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:49:16 +0000 (UTC)

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:41:16 +0100, "Fons" <---> wrote:

>I tried the following construction:
>
>- the Delphi-program generating DLL-Pascal-code
>- writing the DLL-Pascal-code to a file
>- compiling the the code with BPC to a DLL-file
>- the Delphi-program itself calling the DLL
>
>The reason is that it is possible to generate code that runs much faster
>then interpretate it.

I am very impressed by the Delphi compiler
- it has pretty much terminated my ASM days

If you can get any 16 bit stuff to run faster than 32 bit, then I
would be surprized

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Answer to why low and high are bad !
    ... lowe and high are very good for this reason. ... > that the new version of the Delphi compiler is going to allow the ... > don't you fancy learning something about programming some day? ...
    (alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi)
  • Re: DLL with BPC 7.0
    ... please read my response to Marco. ... >>The reason is that it is possible to generate code that runs much faster ... >>then interpretate it. ...
    (comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc)
  • Re: DLL with BPC 7.0
    ... > I tried the following construction: ... > The reason is that it is possible to generate code that runs much faster ... > then interpretate it. ... the 32-bit delphi code should be faster than the 16-bit ...
    (comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc)
  • Re: 3rd party component installation strategy
    ... James Miller wrote: ... so dcu files go in the same directory where the ... That is the main reason why the Delphi compiler takes ages to compile a ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)