Re: using self.free works better for me, why not???
From: J French (erewhon_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 08/08/04
- Next message: Fons: "Outlook Express"
- Previous message: Jamie: "Re: IDE bug in D7 - sets file to 'read-only'...have you experienced this ?"
- In reply to: Martin Harvey (Demon account): "Re: using self.free works better for me, why not???"
- Next in thread: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: using self.free works better for me, why not???"
- Reply: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: using self.free works better for me, why not???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 16:10:11 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:55:03 GMT, "Martin Harvey (Demon account)"
<martin@nospam_pergolesi.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 10:42:19 +0000 (UTC), erewhon@nowhere.com (J
>French) wrote:
>
>>And to expand, using Self.Free is a bit like climbing a tree, sitting
>>on a branch and sawing off that branch at the trunk.
>
>
>LOL! Yes, with the small addition that it all works fine provided that
>no code after the branch sawing off involves the ground that the tree
>is rooted in (i.e. the object instance itself).
I kind of missed that one
It is like climbing a tree,
- and detonating an explosive under its roots
I actually wince at the thought.
- Next message: Fons: "Outlook Express"
- Previous message: Jamie: "Re: IDE bug in D7 - sets file to 'read-only'...have you experienced this ?"
- In reply to: Martin Harvey (Demon account): "Re: using self.free works better for me, why not???"
- Next in thread: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: using self.free works better for me, why not???"
- Reply: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: using self.free works better for me, why not???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
