Re: Discovering variable types...
From: Bjørge Sæther (bjorge_at_hahaha_itte.no)
Date: 08/13/04
- Next message: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: Discovering variable types..."
- Previous message: Marco van de Voort: "Re: Discovering variable types..."
- In reply to:(deleted message) not_at_any.adr: "Re: Discovering variable types..."
- Next in thread: J French: "Re: Discovering variable types..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:48:02 +0200
not@any.adr wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:54:32 +0200, "Maarten Wiltink"
> <maarten@kittensandcats.net> wrote:
>
>> All right. What exactly is the limitation that you'd like to get rid
>> of, and how do you propose to obtain the information you need?
>
> It would be very helpful to be able to obtain the size of memory
> allocated to a variable by passing it's address to a function.
As mentioned, variants and 'array of const' parameters have additional info
with them. If I could have the data type of a variable like I can have it
for a 'array const' or a variant, it would be useful. But...the size ?
I'm just curious...what do you need this for ?
-- Regards, Bjørge Sæther bjorge@haha_itte.no ------------------------------------- I'll not spend any money on American Software products until armed forces are out of Iraq.
- Next message: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: Discovering variable types..."
- Previous message: Marco van de Voort: "Re: Discovering variable types..."
- In reply to:(deleted message) not_at_any.adr: "Re: Discovering variable types..."
- Next in thread: J French: "Re: Discovering variable types..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
