Re: Detecting a running application - FAQ Change?
From: Bruce Roberts (ber_at_bounceitattcanada.xnet)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: Michael Szuchy: "Re: Program crashes before or immediately after begin in project source"
- Previous message: Bruce Roberts: "Re: Detecting a running application - FAQ Change?"
- In reply to: Maarten Wiltink: "Re: Detecting a running application - FAQ Change?"
- Next in thread: Maarten Wiltink: "Re: Detecting a running application - FAQ Change?"
- Reply: Maarten Wiltink: "Re: Detecting a running application - FAQ Change?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:05:01 -0400
"Maarten Wiltink" <maarten@kittensandcats.net> wrote in message
news:41345c2d$0$36860$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> > Uppercase(ExtractFileName(Application.ExeName)+'_2nd_instance_lockout')
> > probably stands a better chance of being unique. Plus it's descriptive.
>
> No argument there. With that, is everybody okay with the new code?
Yes, although I'd prefer something as descriptive but shorter than
'_2nd_instance_lockout'. Perhaps something like 'Running'.
Note to the EvilMiniFAQBoss: Please, please, please can the example not use
C-style spacing as shown above. Its much more readable to have
Uppercase (ExtractFileName (Application.ExeName) + '. . .
It also lets browsers wrap things more easily.
- Next message: Michael Szuchy: "Re: Program crashes before or immediately after begin in project source"
- Previous message: Bruce Roberts: "Re: Detecting a running application - FAQ Change?"
- In reply to: Maarten Wiltink: "Re: Detecting a running application - FAQ Change?"
- Next in thread: Maarten Wiltink: "Re: Detecting a running application - FAQ Change?"
- Reply: Maarten Wiltink: "Re: Detecting a running application - FAQ Change?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|