Re: New to DLLs
From: J French (erewhon_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 09/16/04
- Next message: J French: "Re: Sorting of 4 String-Lists"
- Previous message: J French: "Re: Again on kb_event. It almost works"
- In reply to: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: New to DLLs"
- Next in thread: Rob Kennedy: "Re: New to DLLs"
- Reply: Rob Kennedy: "Re: New to DLLs"
- Reply: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: New to DLLs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:26:23 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:40:21 +0200, "Bjørge Sæther"
<bjorge@hahaha_itte.no> wrote:
<snip>
>A good example of when an Interface is useful - just return an implementing
>object and forget it.
>The calling application would know the interface without being bothered with
>the implementing code.
>If reference counted, it dies when there is no references.
I've always avoided messing with COM in Delphi
(apart from a nightmare visit to the AX Factory for an insistent
client)
I honestly reckon that it is better to work with explicit handles, as
one does with the VCL, rather than introduce COM into the foreground
- but maybe I am just biased ...
- Next message: J French: "Re: Sorting of 4 String-Lists"
- Previous message: J French: "Re: Again on kb_event. It almost works"
- In reply to: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: New to DLLs"
- Next in thread: Rob Kennedy: "Re: New to DLLs"
- Reply: Rob Kennedy: "Re: New to DLLs"
- Reply: Bjørge Sæther: "Re: New to DLLs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|