Re: which memory address space?


"Jud McCranie" <youknowwhat.mccranie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4f8od1pvqqei90c57dfoa8jic1mi1rfe5s@xxxxxxxxxx

> I did my test with XP, and it encountered the problem when the EXE was
> no longer available. It seems to me that it would be better to read
> in the whole thing at the beginning.

In general I disagree. However, this may be a place where an exe packer is a
suitable workaround. Packing the remote executable would, I expect, force it
to be fully loaded before execution.


.

Relevant Pages