Re: Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- From: Nicholas Sherlock <n_sherlock@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:13:53 +1200
jodleren wrote:
I agree that the finally should be better, but that is really not the problem, nor Dormat or those.
The code I posted works perfectly for me. The problem must be elsewhere in your code. Build a test application that has only the code I posted and test it: It should work. Keep adding code until it doesn't. Then you know what is broken (Probably you are overwriting memory etc)
Cheers, Nicholas Sherlock .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- From: jodleren
- Re: Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- References:
- Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- From: jodleren
- Re: Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- From: Nicholas Sherlock
- Re: Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- From: jodleren
- Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- Prev by Date: Re: Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- Next by Date: Re: "Access denied" on file copy
- Previous by thread: Re: Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- Next by thread: Re: Access violation in TJPEGImage on W2K and XP
- Index(es):