Re: Auto-saving the registry
- From: erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx (J French)
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:57:50 +0000 (UTC)
On 26 Sep 2005 23:43:25 -0700, "ronenbitman@xxxxxxxxx"
<ronenbitman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
>the registry is like folders and files, you should be afraid to touch
>the registry if you'r afraid to
>touch the file system
<snip>
It may look to you like the file system
- but to me it don't
To the OP
- why does the spec require Registry entries ?
Can't you explain to the person who wrote the spec that using the
registry as some sort of database is a thick idea
- the sort of thing that MS would come up with
Also - you backing up and restoring the Registry is more likely to
shaft a system than you zapping a few things you should not.
Suggest a simple file association to find your EXE using
FindExecutable, from then on use INI files
.
- References:
- Auto-saving the registry
- From: Douglas J. Horton
- Re: Auto-saving the registry
- From: Rob Kennedy
- Re: Auto-saving the registry
- From: Justin
- Re: Auto-saving the registry
- From: ronenbitman@xxxxxxxxx
- Auto-saving the registry
- Prev by Date: Re: Auto-saving the registry
- Next by Date: Debugging
- Previous by thread: Re: Auto-saving the registry
- Next by thread: Pascal Look - help you understand your pascal unit file .
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
