Re: Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- From: erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx (J French)
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:05:45 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:32:32 +0100, "Maarten Wiltink"
<maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"J French" <erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43edad67.333402220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:27:01 +0100, Hans-Peter Diettrich[...]
<DrDiettrich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
J French schrieb:
There is no particular reason for <COM/ActiveX libraries> to use
the registry - which is half the problem
IMO some kind of registry is always required, ...
Perhaps, better something more robust
There are conflicting requirements. On one hand, you want something
that is easily updated while your browser is already running and
displaying the "application loading" page. On the other hand, you
want to be protected from rogue updates no matter by who: the user,
an honest third program, or a dishonest one.
I'm not sure that I'm keen on updating already running applications
- although sometimes it is useful
Mainly I'm worried about integrity
.
- References:
- Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- From: Bruce Roberts
- Re: Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- From: Rob Kennedy
- Re: Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- From: J French
- Re: Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- From: John Doe
- Re: Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- From: Maarten Wiltink
- Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- Prev by Date: Re: Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- Next by Date: Re: MessageDlg function. Help
- Previous by thread: Re: Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- Next by thread: Re: Borland wants to sell Delphi?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|