Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: "Maarten Wiltink" <maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:40:16 +0100
"J French" <erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44001ba9.161667053@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[...]
Of course using RET makes the COM file more versatile, things like
Foxpro for MSDOS (and probably DBASE, Clipper etc) used to allow you
to load COM files as pseudo DLL's,
Oh wow. I never knew that. It makes perfect sense.
in which case the RET returns
control back to the caller.
However, since I've never used those monstrosities, and don't intend
to start now, I think that the 'versatility' feature, is not really
required.
Perhaps it is inconsiderate of me, depriving posterity of such a
useful routine ... <g>
Yes. Imagine how _short_ they could make "H(e/u)llo world" if they
only had to call an external library for it...
Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: Terry Russell
- Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- References:
- BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: Ian
- Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: Rob Kennedy
- Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: Ian
- Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: Bruce Roberts
- Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: Dodgy
- Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: J French
- Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: Dodgy
- Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- From: J French
- BDS2006 exe sizes
- Prev by Date: Re: Using DLL in Delphi
- Next by Date: Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- Previous by thread: Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- Next by thread: Re: BDS2006 exe sizes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|