Re: g77 & binary vs. unformatted
From: Toon Moene (toon_at_moene.indiv.nluug.nl)
Date: 10/20/03
- Previous message: Gordon Sande: "Re: what's the ifc corresponding argument for -bp in absoft f90"
- In reply to: Rob McDonald: "g77 & binary vs. unformatted"
- Next in thread: Richard Maine: "Re: g77 & binary vs. unformatted"
- Reply: Richard Maine: "Re: g77 & binary vs. unformatted"
- Reply: Rob McDonald: "Re: g77 & binary vs. unformatted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:33:28 +0200
Rob McDonald wrote:
> Is there any way to get g77 to read/write files opened with the "
> form='binary' " flag? If not, and if there are any g77 developers
> listening, is there any chance that this capability will be added?
I am listening (and from the singular you might surmise that the answer
to your question is: vanishingly small).
Development on g77 has stopped more than a year ago - I only fix serious
bugs (and sometimes get help with that because I certainly can't fix
them all by myself).
g95 is where the action is - though the group behind it is more
interested in:
1. A fully conforming Fortran 95 implementation.
2. g77 compatibility.
3. "Easy" Fortran 2003 features.
-- Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/ (under construction)
- Previous message: Gordon Sande: "Re: what's the ifc corresponding argument for -bp in absoft f90"
- In reply to: Rob McDonald: "g77 & binary vs. unformatted"
- Next in thread: Richard Maine: "Re: g77 & binary vs. unformatted"
- Reply: Richard Maine: "Re: g77 & binary vs. unformatted"
- Reply: Rob McDonald: "Re: g77 & binary vs. unformatted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]