Re: ? Fortran compilers
From: Delie (member46282_at_dbforums.com)
Date: 10/30/03
- Next message: Glen Herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Is this legal Fortran 77?"
- Previous message: Richard Maine: "Re: Is this legal Fortran 77?"
- Next in thread: David Frank: "Re: ? Fortran compilers"
- Reply: David Frank: "Re: ? Fortran compilers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:59:25 -0500
It took me about 10 minutes to adapt, compile and execute successfully
with LF95 5.7
Originally posted by David Frank
> "Aleph Mobius" wrote in message
> news:91017fd2.0307090812.77d3f150@posting.google.com"]news:9101-
> 7fd2.0307090812.77d3f150@posting.google.com[/url]...
> > Are there any Freeware compilers that can access the Win32
> API?
>
> no, AFAIK there is only 1 commercial compiler that can directly call
> the win32 api library C routines.
>
> see: http://home.cfl.rr.com/davegemini/get_file.f90"]http://h-
> ome.cfl.rr.com/davegemini/get_file.f90[/url]
>
> for an example of source that I challenged other compiler owners to
> adapt to their system and got no responses back indicating any
success.
-- Posted via http://dbforums.com
- Next message: Glen Herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Is this legal Fortran 77?"
- Previous message: Richard Maine: "Re: Is this legal Fortran 77?"
- Next in thread: David Frank: "Re: ? Fortran compilers"
- Reply: David Frank: "Re: ? Fortran compilers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|