Re: National Labs, Fortran, and free compilers
From: Dr Chaos (mbkennelSPAMBEGONE_at_NOSPAMyahoo.com)
Date: 11/28/03
- Next message: jdn_at_stat.sfu.ca: "NAGware compiler -- f95 to C"
- Previous message: Dr Chaos: "Re: math library"
- In reply to: Gary L. Scott: "Re: National Labs, Fortran, and free compilers"
- Next in thread: Jan C. Vorbrüggen: "Re: National Labs, Fortran, and free compilers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 06:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:51:44 -0600, Gary L. Scott <garyscott@ev1.net> wrote:
>
> The bottom line is of course the only thing important. It costs more to
> have to support multiple platforms. More training, more integration
> headaches.
it costs more to support productive scientists than pointy haired rule
forwarders
- Next message: jdn_at_stat.sfu.ca: "NAGware compiler -- f95 to C"
- Previous message: Dr Chaos: "Re: math library"
- In reply to: Gary L. Scott: "Re: National Labs, Fortran, and free compilers"
- Next in thread: Jan C. Vorbrüggen: "Re: National Labs, Fortran, and free compilers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
