Re: integer(8) problem with CVF 6.6B
From: John Lansberry (john.lansberry_at_jhuapl.edu)
Date: 01/06/04
- Next message: Steven G. Kargl: "Re: Merseene Twister -- A New Fortran 95 Implementation"
- Previous message: Lawson Wakefield: "Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays"
- In reply to: Matthew C Roberts: "Re: integer(8) problem with CVF 6.6B"
- Next in thread: Jugoslav Dujic: "Re: integer(8) problem with CVF 6.6B"
- Reply: Jugoslav Dujic: "Re: integer(8) problem with CVF 6.6B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:40:42 -0500
Matt,
Thanks. Can you tell me exactly how to get 6.6C? I cannot find a link at
the HP website. Is there a "good" ftp address?
Thanks,
John
"Matthew C Roberts" <roberts.628@nationalchampions.osu.edu> wrote in message
news:3ffadc72.5766832@nntp.service.ohio-state.edu...
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:10:48 -0500, "John Lansberry"
> <john.lansberry@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
>
> >This question is related to an earlier post from Scott Robert Ladd, but I
> >was wondering if other CVF 6.6B users have the same problem.
> >
> John,
>
> I had the exact same problem--upgrading to 6.6C fixes this.
>
> Matt.
>
>
>
>
- Next message: Steven G. Kargl: "Re: Merseene Twister -- A New Fortran 95 Implementation"
- Previous message: Lawson Wakefield: "Re: ALLOCATABLE arrays"
- In reply to: Matthew C Roberts: "Re: integer(8) problem with CVF 6.6B"
- Next in thread: Jugoslav Dujic: "Re: integer(8) problem with CVF 6.6B"
- Reply: Jugoslav Dujic: "Re: integer(8) problem with CVF 6.6B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|