Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users
From: Jan C. Vorbrüggen (jvorbrueggen_at_mediasec.de)
Date: 01/28/04
- Next message: Jan C. Vorbrüggen: "Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users"
- Previous message: Urtzi Jauregi: "Re: Seeking F90 compiler for P IV under Linux -- Lahey or Intel?"
- In reply to: Duane Bozarth: "Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users"
- Next in thread: Richard Maine: "Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users"
- Reply: Richard Maine: "Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:47:15 +0100
> I think the only cases he actually spoke of were for shorter actual
> arguments than dummies, Richard.
Yes, that was what I was thinking about.
> I no longer remember enough of my VAX time to have any clear recollection
> of what happened if you made the mistake the other way.
The argument list usually contained a list of addresses to the actual
arguments (no register-based argument passing), unless you explicitly
passed an argument by value. When you then overwrote with a larger-sized
item, the usual unpredictable stuff would occur - unless it was a constant
argument, in which case you trigger an access violation.
Jan
- Next message: Jan C. Vorbrüggen: "Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users"
- Previous message: Urtzi Jauregi: "Re: Seeking F90 compiler for P IV under Linux -- Lahey or Intel?"
- In reply to: Duane Bozarth: "Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users"
- Next in thread: Richard Maine: "Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users"
- Reply: Richard Maine: "Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|