comp.lang.fortran
By Date

1546 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

Starting: 01/31/04
Ending: 02/29/04

Re: intel linux compiler Richard Maine (02/29/04)
Re: newbie - dimensioning arrays and loading data in an old program Richard Maine (02/29/04)
Re: newbie - dimensioning arrays and loading data in an old program Duane Bozarth (02/29/04)
Re: intel linux compiler Ken Plotkin (02/29/04)
Re: newbie - dimensioning arrays and loading data in an old program Ken Plotkin (02/29/04)
Re: newbie - dimensioning arrays and loading data in an old program Alf (02/29/04)
Re: Byte counting and newlines Gordon Sande (02/29/04)
Re: intel linux compiler Tim Prince (02/29/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Duane Bozarth (02/29/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Clive Page (02/29/04)
intel linux compiler Ki Hwan Lee (02/29/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Dan Tex1 (02/29/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Matthew (02/29/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Greg Lindahl (02/29/04)
Re: newbie - dimensioning arrays and loading data in an old program glen herrmannsfeldt (02/29/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Rob (02/29/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Rob (02/29/04)
Re: Indirect array addressing of optional parameters illegal? Bård Skaflestad (02/29/04)
Re: newbie - dimensioning arrays and loading data in an old program Ken Plotkin (02/29/04)
Re: Indirect array addressing of optional parameters illegal? Bård Skaflestad (02/29/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Ken Plotkin (02/29/04)
Re: Use of subroutines bv (02/29/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Kevin G. Rhoads (02/29/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Kevin G. Rhoads (02/29/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Pterostyrax (02/29/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Kevin G. Rhoads (02/29/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Pterostyrax (02/29/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Pterostyrax (02/28/04)
Re: Byte counting and newlines Ken Plotkin (02/28/04)
newbie - dimensioning arrays and loading data in an old program Jack (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines glen herrmannsfeldt (02/28/04)
Re: Byte counting and newlines Gordon Sande (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Kevin G. Rhoads (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Chien (02/28/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Dan Tex1 (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Pierre Asselin (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Gerry Thomas (02/28/04)
Re: Byte counting and newlines Ken Plotkin (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Ken Plotkin (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Duane Bozarth (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Kevin G. Rhoads (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Kevin G. Rhoads (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Kevin G. Rhoads (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Richard Maine (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Chien (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Chien (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Catherine Rees Lay (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Chien (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Duane Bozarth (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Pterostyrax (02/28/04)
Re: Byte counting and newlines David Frank (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Pterostyrax (02/28/04)
Re: Byte counting and newlines Dan Nagle (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Pterostyrax (02/28/04)
Re: MODULE vs INCLUDE (CVF Directives) Gary L. Scott (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines glen herrmannsfeldt (02/28/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Lindahl (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Chien (02/28/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future analyst41 (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/28/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Dan Tex1 (02/28/04)
Re: C++/Fortran mixing William Clodius (02/28/04)
Re: Co-arrays Greg Lindahl (02/28/04)
Re: Use of subroutines glen herrmannsfeldt (02/27/04)
Re: What is the major difference between Fortran90 and Fortran95? Andy Mai (02/27/04)
Re: C++/Fortran mixing glen herrmannsfeldt (02/27/04)
Re: Procedure argument matching... Richard Maine (02/27/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Ed Wells (02/27/04)
Re: Procedure argument matching... James Van Buskirk (02/27/04)
Re: Procedure argument matching... Richard Maine (02/27/04)
Re: Procedure argument matching... Dick Hendrickson (02/27/04)
Re: Procedure argument matching... Rich Townsend (02/27/04)
Re: Procedure argument matching... Steve Lionel (02/27/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Richard Maine (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Walter Spector (02/27/04)
Re: Procedure argument matching... Richard Maine (02/27/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Paul van Delst (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Richard Maine (02/27/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Stewart Gordon (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Walter Spector (02/27/04)
Re: Procedure argument matching... Rich Townsend (02/27/04)
Procedure argument matching... Rich Townsend (02/27/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed Kevin G. Rhoads (02/27/04)
Re: Indirect array addressing of optional parameters illegal? Richard Maine (02/27/04)
Re: Indirect array addressing of optional parameters illegal? Dick Hendrickson (02/27/04)
Re: Copy of DVF/CVF needed Steve Lionel (02/27/04)
Re: C++/Fortran mixing E. Robert Tisdale (02/27/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Paul van Delst (02/27/04)
Re: C++/Fortran mixing beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/27/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/27/04)
Re: Copy of DVF/CVF needed beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/27/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Pierre Asselin (02/27/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Chien (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future ioson (02/27/04)
Re: MODULE vs INCLUDE (CVF Directives) Steve Lionel (02/27/04)
Re: intel fortran error message Steve Lionel (02/27/04)
Re: DVF/CVF/IVF: How to access the EXE's file version info? Steve Lionel (02/27/04)
MODULE vs INCLUDE (CVF Directives) Gary L. Scott (02/27/04)
Re: Q: Summary Argument Passing Convention(s) Arjen Markus (02/27/04)
Re: Q: Summary Argument Passing Convention(s) Gary L. Scott (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Claus Pedersen (02/27/04)
intel fortran error message flubie (02/27/04)
Re: Co-arrays Dan Nagle (02/27/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Catherine Rees Lay (02/27/04)
Re: f95 vs. F compilation question Will Henney (02/27/04)
Re: DVF/CVF/IVF: How to access the EXE's file version info? Stephan Petersen (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Helge Avlesen (02/27/04)
Re: Q: Summary Argument Passing Convention(s) Arjen Markus (02/27/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Theodore W. Hall (02/27/04)
Indirect array addressing of optional parameters illegal? Bård Skaflestad (02/27/04)
Re: C++/Fortran mixing Jack Klein (02/27/04)
Troll Alert: Use of subroutines E. Robert Tisdale (02/27/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Lindahl (02/27/04)
Re: Use of subroutines glen herrmannsfeldt (02/27/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Chien (02/27/04)
Q: Summary Argument Passing Convention(s) Gary L. Scott (02/27/04)
Re: Use of subroutines glen herrmannsfeldt (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future analyst41 (02/27/04)
Re: DVF/CVF/IVF: How to access the EXE's file version info? Steve Lionel (02/27/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Chien (02/27/04)
Re: Use of subroutines bv (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future bv (02/27/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/27/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/27/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/27/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary Strand (02/27/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Ed Wells (02/27/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Richard Maine (02/27/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Steven G. Kargl (02/27/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Greg Lindahl (02/27/04)
Re: C++/Fortran mixing NM (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/26/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Ed Wells (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/26/04)
Re: Initial padding for common block Richard Maine (02/26/04)
Re: C++/Fortran mixing E. Robert Tisdale (02/26/04)
Re: C++/Fortran mixing NM (02/26/04)
Re: Initial padding for common block glen herrmannsfeldt (02/26/04)
C++/Fortran mixing NM (02/26/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed Michael Prager (02/26/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Michael Prager (02/26/04)
Re: Initial padding for common block Richard Maine (02/26/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Lindahl (02/26/04)
Re: Initial padding for common block glen herrmannsfeldt (02/26/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary Strand (02/26/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Walt Brainerd (02/26/04)
Re: Initial padding for common block Richard Maine (02/26/04)
Re: Initial padding for common block glen herrmannsfeldt (02/26/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed Steve Lionel (02/26/04)
Re: Co-arrays Greg Lindahl (02/26/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed Greg Lindahl (02/26/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Richard Maine (02/26/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Richard Maine (02/26/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array James Van Buskirk (02/26/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Duane Bozarth (02/26/04)
Copy of DVF/CVF needed meridian_at_cix.compulink.co.uk (02/26/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Richard Maine (02/26/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future analyst41 (02/26/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Richard Maine (02/26/04)
Re: Initial padding for common block Walt Brainerd (02/26/04)
Re: INCLUDE file Gordon Sande (02/26/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array glen herrmannsfeldt (02/26/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Richard Maine (02/26/04)
Re: Use of subroutines Greg Chien (02/26/04)
Re: Use of subroutines glen herrmannsfeldt (02/26/04)
Re: f95 vs. F compilation question Walt Brainerd (02/26/04)
Initial padding for common block marlinswin_at_yahoo.com (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Dick Hendrickson (02/26/04)
Use of subroutines Pterostyrax (02/26/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed Steve Lionel (02/26/04)
Re: INCLUDE file Dan Tex1 (02/26/04)
Re: INCLUDE file Les (02/26/04)
Re: f95 vs. F compilation question Will Henney (02/26/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed James Cownie (02/26/04)
Re: INCLUDE file Arjen Markus (02/26/04)
INCLUDE file Luca Pignagnoli (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Charles Russell (02/26/04)
Re: DVF/CVF/IVF: How to access the EXE's file version info? Jugoslav Dujic (02/26/04)
DVF/CVF/IVF: How to access the EXE's file version info? Stephan Petersen (02/26/04)
Re: Co-arrays Dan Nagle (02/26/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed glen herrmannsfeldt (02/26/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed James Cownie (02/26/04)
Re: Array-valued expression James Cownie (02/26/04)
Re: Automatic variables Jugoslav Dujic (02/26/04)
Re: Rudamentary CONSOLE I/O Routines for Windows Gary L. Scott (02/26/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Richard Maine (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Paul van Delst (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Greg Lindahl (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Rich Townsend (02/26/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/26/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed glen herrmannsfeldt (02/25/04)
Re: buggy code or buggy compiler? Steven G. Kargl (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Larry Young (02/25/04)
buggy code or buggy compiler? Mike Zulauf (02/25/04)
Re: Automatic variables Steve Lionel (02/25/04)
Re: Function with a dimension argument. Claus Pedersen (02/25/04)
Re: Automatic variables James Van Buskirk (02/25/04)
Re: Function with a dimension argument. James Van Buskirk (02/25/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Ed Wells (02/25/04)
Re: Co-arrays Helge Avlesen (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out James Van Buskirk (02/25/04)
Re: Function with a dimension argument. Rich Townsend (02/25/04)
Re: Function with a dimension argument. Claus Pedersen (02/25/04)
Re: Function with a dimension argument. Rich Townsend (02/25/04)
Re: Co-arrays Greg Lindahl (02/25/04)
Re: Co-arrays Greg Lindahl (02/25/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed Steve Lionel (02/25/04)
Re: Array-valued expression Dick Hendrickson (02/25/04)
Re: Rudamentary CONSOLE I/O Routines for Windows Steve Lionel (02/25/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed Kevin G. Rhoads (02/25/04)
Function with a dimension argument. Claus Pedersen (02/25/04)
Re: Rudamentary CONSOLE I/O Routines for Windows Gary Scott (02/25/04)
Re: Language lawyer interpretation needed glen herrmannsfeldt (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Herman D. Knoble (02/25/04)
Automatic variables Richard Dell (02/25/04)
Re: f95 vs. F compilation question Rich Townsend (02/25/04)
f95 vs. F compilation question Bart Vandewoestyne (02/25/04)
Language lawyer interpretation needed Kevin G. Rhoads (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out James Van Buskirk (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out James Van Buskirk (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Herman D. Knoble (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Herman D. Knoble (02/25/04)
Fortran FASTER on net? David Frank (02/25/04)
Re: Array-valued expression Arjen Markus (02/25/04)
job Highland Statistics (02/25/04)
Array-valued expression Gus Gassmann (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Larry Young (02/25/04)
Re: Co-arrays Dan Nagle (02/25/04)
Co-arrays Helge Avlesen (02/25/04)
Re: Rudamentary CONSOLE I/O Routines for Windows David Jones (02/25/04)
Re: SOLVED --- Re: possible ifort bug ??? Tony Jay (02/25/04)
Re: modifying constants glen herrmannsfeldt (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out James Van Buskirk (02/25/04)
Re: Rudamentary CONSOLE I/O Routines for Windows Gary L. Scott (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Richard Maine (02/25/04)
Re: modifying constants Richard Maine (02/25/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Richard Maine (02/25/04)
Re: [OT] Re: timing a program on Windows Gerry Thomas (02/25/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Ken Plotkin (02/25/04)
Re: [OT] Re: timing a program on Windows Ken Plotkin (02/25/04)
Re: interfaces in include files bv (02/25/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows bv (02/25/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Larry Young (02/25/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array glen herrmannsfeldt (02/25/04)
Re: modifying constants Richard Maine (02/25/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out James Van Buskirk (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants glen herrmannsfeldt (02/24/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Greg Lindahl (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Rich Townsend (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants glen herrmannsfeldt (02/24/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array glen herrmannsfeldt (02/24/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out glen herrmannsfeldt (02/24/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Gary Strand (02/24/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Paul van Delst (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants glen herrmannsfeldt (02/24/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Larry Young (02/24/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Kevin G. Rhoads (02/24/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Paul van Delst (02/24/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Greg Lindahl (02/24/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Mike Walters (02/24/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Ed Wells (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Larry Young (02/24/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Larry Young (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants glen herrmannsfeldt (02/24/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Greg Lindahl (02/24/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: SOLVED --- Re: possible ifort bug ??? Greg Lindahl (02/24/04)
Re: SOLVED --- Re: possible ifort bug ??? Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Dick Hendrickson (02/24/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Richard Maine (02/24/04)
Re: Copy-in/Copy-out Herman D. Knoble (02/24/04)
Re: SOLVED --- Re: possible ifort bug ??? Rich Townsend (02/24/04)
Re: SOLVED --- Re: possible ifort bug ??? Paul van Delst (02/24/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Paul van Delst (02/24/04)
Copy-in/Copy-out Larry Young (02/24/04)
SOLVED --- Re: possible ifort bug ??? flubie (02/24/04)
Re: possible ifort bug ??? Steve Lionel (02/24/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Chien (02/24/04)
Re: possible ifort bug ??? Herman D. Knoble (02/24/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Larry Young (02/24/04)
Re: possible ifort bug ??? Herman D. Knoble (02/24/04)
Re: Pass string from VB.NET to fortran DLL Pierre Asselin (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Herman D. Knoble (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants John Collins (02/24/04)
Re: possible ifort bug ??? Tony Jay (02/24/04)
Re: Embedded SQL in f90 on WIndows Jugoslav Dujic (02/24/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Dan Nagle (02/24/04)
Pass string from VB.NET to fortran DLL toke (02/24/04)
possible ifort bug ??? flubie (02/24/04)
Embedded SQL in f90 on WIndows Nitesh (02/24/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future analyst41 (02/24/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Catherine Rees Lay (02/24/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information Jugoslav Dujic (02/24/04)
Rudamentary CONSOLE I/O Routines for Windows Gary L. Scott (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants TimC (02/24/04)
Re: Converting Fortran module to C++ glen herrmannsfeldt (02/24/04)
Re: Converting Fortran module to C++ anhvt11 (02/24/04)
Re: Converting Fortran module to C++ anhvt11 (02/24/04)
Re: Converting Fortran module to C++ Rich Townsend (02/24/04)
Re: Converting Fortran module to C++ anhvt11 (02/24/04)
Re: [OT] Re: timing a program on Windows Ken Plotkin (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants robin (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants glen herrmannsfeldt (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Greg Lindahl (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Greg Lindahl (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants glen herrmannsfeldt (02/24/04)
Re: modifying constants Richard Maine (02/24/04)
modifying constants Greg Lindahl (02/24/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future E. Robert Tisdale (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Richard Maine (02/23/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information Ken Fairfield (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future analyst41 (02/23/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information glen herrmannsfeldt (02/23/04)
Re: Sun compiler bug with ELEMENTAL? Claus Pedersen (02/23/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows glen herrmannsfeldt (02/23/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Gerry Thomas (02/23/04)
Re: Sun compiler bug with ELEMENTAL? Richard Maine (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Toon Moene (02/23/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows glen herrmannsfeldt (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Lindahl (02/23/04)
Sun compiler bug with ELEMENTAL? Rich Townsend (02/23/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information Gordon Sande (02/23/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information glen herrmannsfeldt (02/23/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Michael Prager (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gerry Thomas (02/23/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/23/04)
Re: Do-loop standards conformance Richard Maine (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future James Giles (02/23/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Richard Maine (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Richard Maine (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Chien (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Rich Townsend (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Les (02/23/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Ed Wells (02/23/04)
Re: Do-loop standards conformance Herman D. Knoble (02/23/04)
Re: Do-loop standards conformance Rich Townsend (02/23/04)
RE: Challenge: statement to reverse char bits meek_at_skyway.usask.ca (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Chien (02/23/04)
Re: Do-loop standards conformance Herman D. Knoble (02/23/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Rich Townsend (02/23/04)
Re: Function evaluation Svyatoslav Gladkov (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Dan Nagle (02/23/04)
Data Plotting Library DISLIN for G95/Linux Helmut Michels (02/23/04)
Re: Do-loop standards conformance B52B_at_pl (02/23/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Jugoslav Dujic (02/23/04)
Re: Function evaluation Jugoslav Dujic (02/23/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information Jugoslav Dujic (02/23/04)
Re: petition to retire Fortran Brian Salter-Duke (02/23/04)
Re: OT: S/N ratios - was Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Lindahl (02/23/04)
Re: Challenge: statement to reverse char bits Greg Lindahl (02/23/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Tim Prince (02/23/04)
petition to retire Fortran E. Robert Tisdale (02/23/04)
Re: Fortran advocacy (was Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future) J. F. Cornwall (02/23/04)
Re: Do-loop standards conformance Richard Maine (02/23/04)
Re: Fortran for Mac ? Jean-Charles (02/23/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Ken Plotkin (02/23/04)
Re: A basic, vexing question about lunits and file descriptors Dave Thompson (02/23/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Gordon Sande (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future James Giles (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary L. Scott (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary L. Scott (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Chien (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future bv (02/23/04)
Do-loop standards conformance Rich Townsend (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future James Giles (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary L. Scott (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Chien (02/23/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future James Giles (02/22/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Rich Townsend (02/22/04)
Re: Fortran advocacy (was Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future) Athanasios Migdalas (02/22/04)
Re: Fortran advocacy (was Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future) Ken Plotkin (02/22/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Herman D. Knoble (02/22/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Ken Plotkin (02/22/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Catherine Rees Lay (02/22/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Richard Maine (02/22/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Chien (02/22/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Gordon Sande (02/22/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Gordon Sande (02/22/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary L. Scott (02/22/04)
OT: S/N ratios - was Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Duane Bozarth (02/22/04)
Re: Fortran for Mac ? Gary L. Scott (02/22/04)
Re: Eigensystems in Fortran with MPI Ian Bush (02/22/04)
Re: Fortran advocacy (was Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/22/04)
Re: Challenge: statement to reverse char bits David Frank (02/22/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows James Van Buskirk (02/22/04)
Re: Challenge: statement to reverse char bits James Van Buskirk (02/22/04)
Re: FORTRAN or COBOL first ? berlutte_at_sympatico.ca (02/22/04)
Challenge: statement to reverse char bits David Frank (02/22/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Paul Bolton (02/22/04)
Re: Fortran for Mac ? Andrew McLaren (02/22/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Ed Wells (02/22/04)
Fortran for Mac ? Jean-Charles (02/22/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future James Giles (02/22/04)
Re: timing a program on Windows Ken Plotkin (02/22/04)
Re: ifort 8.0: exporting module procedure bug Steve Lionel (02/22/04)
timing a program on Windows beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/22/04)
Eigensystems in Fortran with MPI Maxime Boissonneault (02/22/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary L. Scott (02/22/04)
Re: Fortran advocacy (was Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future) Ken Plotkin (02/22/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future James Giles (02/22/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary L. Scott (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Greg Lindahl (02/21/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array James Giles (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Dr Ivan D. Reid (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Dan Tex1 (02/21/04)
Fortran advocacy (was Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Duane Bozarth (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary L. Scott (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Matthew (02/21/04)
Re: appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array Rich Townsend (02/21/04)
appending elements to an ALLOCATABLE array beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary L. Scott (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Gary L. Scott (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Ken Plotkin (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Andy Nelson (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Tabon (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future _at_(none) (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future sama (02/21/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Dan Tex1 (02/21/04)
Re: Fortran 2003 and F Richard Maine (02/21/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) Ken Fairfield (02/21/04)
Re: Fortran 2003 and F Han JIANG (02/21/04)
Re: Fortran 2003 and F Walt Brainerd (02/21/04)
Re: appending to a char Dick Hendrickson (02/20/04)
Re: appending to a char Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: appending to a char Dick Hendrickson (02/20/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants Donald Arseneau (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines E. Robert Tisdale (02/20/04)
Re: netcdf and the intel fortran 8.0 compiler Jason (02/20/04)
Function evaluation Svyatoslav Gladkov (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: What is the major difference between Fortran90 and Fortran95? Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: Pointers to elements of allocated array. Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: About assumed array Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines E. Robert Tisdale (02/20/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines E. Robert Tisdale (02/20/04)
Re: problems converting unix code to linux code (direct access files) Michael Metcalf (02/20/04)
Re: problems converting unix code to linux code (direct access files) Paul van Delst (02/20/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Paul van Delst (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Pablo (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Paul van Delst (02/20/04)
problems converting unix code to linux code (direct access files) Paula (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Rich Townsend (02/20/04)
Re: What is the major difference between Fortran90 and Fortran95? beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/20/04)
Re: Pointers to elements of allocated array. Michael Metcalf (02/20/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants David Ham (02/20/04)
Re: Pointers to elements of allocated array. David Ham (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Catherine Rees Lay (02/20/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information Richard Edgar (02/20/04)
Re: About assumed array Michael Metcalf (02/20/04)
Re: A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Ken Plotkin (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) Richard Edgar (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/20/04)
Re: Fortran90 and XML DOM Arjen Markus (02/20/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/20/04)
Re: Fortran 2003 and F Michael White (02/20/04)
Re: Strange address error with IFC Madhusudan Singh (02/20/04)
A petition to J3 apropos FORTRAN's future Matthew (02/20/04)
About assumed array Jurang (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines James Giles (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines E. Robert Tisdale (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Richard Maine (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines James Giles (02/20/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/19/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Bart Vandewoestyne (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines E. Robert Tisdale (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines E. Robert Tisdale (02/19/04)
Re: FLECS Preprocessor Availability Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Paul van Delst (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? James Giles (02/19/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Greg Lindahl (02/19/04)
Re: Fortran90 and XML DOM alex (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: VMS Fortran RTL restriction on file names? Gary Scott (02/19/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/19/04)
Re: What is the major difference between Fortran90 and Fortran95? beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/19/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines E. Robert Tisdale (02/19/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Dr Chaos (02/19/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants Toby White (02/19/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Pointers to elements of allocated array. Michael Metcalf (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Michael Metcalf (02/19/04)
Re: What is the major difference between Fortran90 and Fortran95? Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Gordon Sande (02/19/04)
Pointers to elements of allocated array. Ed Wells (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/19/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Fortran90 and XML DOM Mart Rentmeester (02/19/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants Catherine Rees Lay (02/19/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Rich Townsend (02/19/04)
Re: Fortran 2003 and F Rich Townsend (02/19/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Jugoslav Dujic (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Rich Townsend (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Michael Metcalf (02/19/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Embedding CVS Information Paul van Delst (02/19/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Michael Klatt (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) Jugoslav Dujic (02/19/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants Herman D. Knoble (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines Paul van Delst (02/19/04)
Embedding CVS Information Richard Edgar (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) Paul van Delst (02/19/04)
Re: VMS Fortran RTL restriction on file names? Steve Lionel (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Michael Metcalf (02/19/04)
Re: Fortran90 and XML DOM Arjen Markus (02/19/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants David Ham (02/19/04)
Re: Simple question about literal constants Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/19/04)
Re: What is the major difference between Fortran90 and Fortran95? Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/19/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Paul van Delst (02/19/04)
Simple question about literal constants Bernhard Georg Enders (02/19/04)
Fortran90 and XML DOM alex (02/19/04)
What is the major difference between Fortran90 and Fortran95? alex (02/19/04)
Fortran 2003 and F beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) Gary L. Scott (02/19/04)
Re: VMS Fortran RTL restriction on file names? Bob Koehler (02/19/04)
Re: VMS Fortran RTL restriction on file names? Bob Koehler (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? David Frank (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Michael Metcalf (02/19/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/19/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/19/04)
Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/19/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Michael Metcalf (02/19/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Les (02/19/04)
Re: Strange address error with IFC Greg Lindahl (02/19/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Jan Mandel (02/19/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Jan Mandel (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines E. Robert Tisdale (02/19/04)
Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/19/04)
Re: FLECS Preprocessor Availability Bill Blum (02/19/04)
Re: FLECS Preprocessor Availability Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: FLECS Preprocessor Availability CW Crane (02/19/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Walt Brainerd (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) Rich Townsend (02/19/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: FLECS Preprocessor Availability Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Functions vs. Subroutines (was Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny)) Paul van Delst (02/19/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Rich Townsend (02/19/04)
Re: [OT] Funny James Van Buskirk (02/19/04)
Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny) Rich Townsend (02/19/04)
Re: checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny) Rich Townsend (02/19/04)
checking array arguments (was Re: [OT] Funny) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/19/04)
FLECS Preprocessor Availability CW Crane (02/19/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Richard Maine (02/19/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Rich Townsend (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Rich Townsend (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Richard Maine (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Richard Maine (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Richard Maine (02/18/04)
Re: netcdf and the intel fortran 8.0 compiler Harald Anlauf (02/18/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Ross Bogue (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Rich Townsend (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Paul van Delst (02/18/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Dick Hendrickson (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny James Giles (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Richard Maine (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny John Harper (02/18/04)
Re: VMS Fortran RTL restriction on file names? John Reagan (02/18/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Gordon Sande (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Rich Townsend (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Rich Townsend (02/18/04)
Re: VMS Fortran RTL restriction on file names? Steve Lionel (02/18/04)
VMS Fortran RTL restriction on file names? Bob Koehler (02/18/04)
Re: interfaces in include files James Van Buskirk (02/18/04)
Re: netcdf and the intel fortran 8.0 compiler Trevor (02/18/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Richard Maine (02/18/04)
Re: netcdf and the intel fortran 8.0 compiler Paul van Delst (02/18/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Paul van Delst (02/18/04)
netcdf and the intel fortran 8.0 compiler Owen Leonard (02/18/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? rsjohnson (02/18/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Richard Maine (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Richard Maine (02/18/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Paul van Delst (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Michael Metcalf (02/18/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Steve Lionel (02/18/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Steve Lionel (02/18/04)
Re: memory management bug in CVF-6.6.C Steve Lionel (02/18/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Gordon Sande (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Rich Townsend (02/18/04)
Re: memory management bug in CVF-6.6.C alexander chupeev (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/18/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/18/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Tony Jay (02/18/04)
Re: interfaces in include files Michael Metcalf (02/18/04)
interfaces in include files Tony Jay (02/18/04)
Re: Elements of multidimensional arrays - Fortran vs Matlab fermat (02/18/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Catherine Rees Lay (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny E P Chandler (02/18/04)
Fortran Resources (February) Michael Metcalf (02/18/04)
Re: [OT] Funny Claus Pedersen (02/18/04)
Re: ifc 7.1 & FFTW Version 3 Steven G. Johnson (02/18/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Gerry Thomas (02/18/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Gerry Thomas (02/18/04)
[OT] Funny Madhusudan Singh (02/18/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Gary L. Scott (02/18/04)
Re: Displaying numbers beyond [E-99,E+99] Madhusudan Singh (02/18/04)
Re: Displaying numbers beyond [E-99,E+99] Madhusudan Singh (02/18/04)
Re: Displaying numbers beyond [E-99,E+99] Madhusudan Singh (02/18/04)
Re: Displaying numbers beyond [E-99,E+99] Grant (02/18/04)
Re: Displaying numbers beyond [E-99,E+99] Grant (02/18/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Dr Chaos (02/17/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Dr Chaos (02/17/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Steve Lionel (02/17/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Steve Lionel (02/17/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Ross Bogue (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency James Giles (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency James Giles (02/17/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Richard Maine (02/17/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Herman D. Knoble (02/17/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Herman D. Knoble (02/17/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Richard Maine (02/17/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Michael Metcalf (02/17/04)
Re: How does one create multidimensional array constants? Michael Metcalf (02/17/04)
How does one create multidimensional array constants? rsjohnson (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency James Van Buskirk (02/17/04)
"Fortran Programmers Club" was updated Vladimir V.Vasilchenko (02/17/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Gerry Thomas (02/17/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Ross Bogue (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Greg Lindahl (02/17/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Ross Bogue (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency James Giles (02/17/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code J. F. Cornwall (02/17/04)
Re: Elements of multidimensional arrays - Fortran vs Matlab Michael Metcalf (02/17/04)
Re: ifc 7.1 & FFTW Version 3 Helge Kreutzmann (02/17/04)
Re: Elements of multidimensional arrays - Fortran vs Matlab Richard Maine (02/17/04)
Re: Elements of multidimensional arrays - Fortran vs Matlab Michael Metcalf (02/17/04)
Re: Elements of multidimensional arrays - Fortran vs Matlab Michael Metcalf (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency David Ham (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency David Ham (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Michael Metcalf (02/17/04)
Re: Example multi-precision code Herman D. Knoble (02/17/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Steve Lionel (02/17/04)
Re: memory management bug in CVF-6.6.C Steve Lionel (02/17/04)
Example multi-precision code Ross Bogue (02/17/04)
Elements of multidimensional arrays - Fortran vs Matlab fermat (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency David Ham (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency David Ham (02/17/04)
Re: Variable Format Expressions Walt Brainerd (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Paul van Delst (02/17/04)
Re: F90 Matrix Memory Size David Ham (02/17/04)
Re: F90 Matrix Memory Size Bintz, S. H. (Silvia) (02/17/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Arjen Markus (02/17/04)
Re: Sun Fortran Compiler bug? Robert Corbett (02/17/04)
Re: debugging Tom Micevski (02/17/04)
Re: debugging Tom Micevski (02/17/04)
Re: Variable Format Expressions James Giles (02/17/04)
Re: Variable Format Expressions Richard Maine (02/17/04)
Re: Passing array of derived data types to a subroutine Richard Maine (02/17/04)
Re: how to measure very long time intervals in fortarn 77 Richard Maine (02/17/04)
Re: Variable Format Expressions James Giles (02/17/04)
Passing array of derived data types to a subroutine Greg Dutkowski (02/16/04)
Re: understanding array dimensions kia (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Bob Lidral (02/16/04)
Re: F90 Matrix Memory Size beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Van Buskirk (02/16/04)
Re: how to measure very long time intervals in fortarn 77 Steven G. Kargl (02/16/04)
Re: Sun Fortran Compiler bug? Markus Gyger (02/16/04)
how to measure very long time intervals in fortarn 77 Kostrena (02/16/04)
Re: F90 Matrix Memory Size Herman D. Knoble (02/16/04)
Re: F90 Matrix Memory Size Helge Avlesen (02/16/04)
Re: F90 Matrix Memory Size David Ham (02/16/04)
Re: Sun Fortran Compiler bug? Richard Maine (02/16/04)
F90 Matrix Memory Size Bintz, S. H. (Silvia) (02/16/04)
Sun Fortran Compiler bug? Dan McKinley (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Dan Nagle (02/16/04)
Re: memory management bug in CVF-6.6.C Steve Lionel (02/16/04)
Re: Could somebody help me with LINKING problem? André Janz (02/16/04)
[ANN] Data Plotting Library DISLIN 8.2 Helmut Michels (02/16/04)
Re: divide two integers Michael Metcalf (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i August Derleth (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency David Ham (02/16/04)
Re: Is this legal Fortran code? Tim Hultberg (02/16/04)
divide two integers Bernard Bru (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Greg Lindahl (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Michael Metcalf (02/16/04)
Re: xml parsers in fortran Arjen Markus (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency glen herrmannsfeldt (02/16/04)
Re: debugging Vihang (02/16/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Richard Maine (02/16/04)
Re: debugging Richard Maine (02/16/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Richard Maine (02/16/04)
Re: to calculate execution time in Fortran 77 balupari (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Richard Maine (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency James Van Buskirk (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Richard Maine (02/16/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Vihang (02/16/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency glen herrmannsfeldt (02/16/04)
Re: debugging Tom Micevski (02/16/04)
debugging Puneet (02/16/04)
Re: Mutual derived type dependencies Michael Metcalf (02/15/04)
Re: Displaying numbers beyond [E-99,E+99] Michael Metcalf (02/15/04)
Mutual derived type dependencies Michael Klatt (02/15/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Jan Mandel (02/15/04)
Could somebody help me with LINKING problem? Amy (02/15/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/15/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Gary L. Scott (02/15/04)
understanding array dimensions beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/15/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Gerry Thomas (02/15/04)
Re: Compiler options for XL Fortran on AIX Ian Bush (02/15/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Michael Metcalf (02/15/04)
Re: Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency glen herrmannsfeldt (02/15/04)
Re: Character substrings David Klein (02/15/04)
Fortran memory management, error handling, and efficiency Jan Mandel (02/15/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Robert Corbett (02/15/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Dr Ivan D. Reid (02/14/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Dr Ivan D. Reid (02/14/04)
Re: Compiler bug? Richard Maine (02/14/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Tim Prince (02/14/04)
Solaris/OpenMP Linking Error Gary L. Scott (02/14/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Gary L. Scott (02/14/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Gary L. Scott (02/14/04)
Re: ARPACK reverse communication interface Rich Townsend (02/14/04)
Re: Compiler bug? glen herrmannsfeldt (02/14/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions bv (02/14/04)
Re: ARPACK reverse communication interface E. Robert Tisdale (02/14/04)
Re: ARPACK reverse communication interface Ken Plotkin (02/14/04)
Re: ARPACK reverse communication interface Rich Townsend (02/14/04)
Re: Compiler bug? Dave Thompson (02/14/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Albert Herman (02/14/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Richard Maine (02/14/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Gary L. Scott (02/14/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Gary L. Scott (02/14/04)
ARPACK reverse communication interface E. Robert Tisdale (02/14/04)
Compiler options for XL Fortran on AIX Recif (02/13/04)
Re: to calculate execution time in Fortran 77 beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/13/04)
Re: How to compile this? Bart Vandewoestyne (02/13/04)
Re: Libraries compiled modules Richard Maine (02/13/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Vladimir V.Vasilchenko (02/13/04)
Re: Something on CVF 6.6C Richard Maine (02/13/04)
Something on CVF 6.6C Vladimir V.Vasilchenko (02/13/04)
Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) Rich Townsend (02/13/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Richard Maine (02/13/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Gerry Thomas (02/13/04)
Libraries compiled modules Pierre Asselin (02/13/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Jugoslav Dujic (02/13/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Richard Maine (02/13/04)
Re: GUI without resource files Richard Maine (02/13/04)
Re: Is this legal Fortran code? Richard Maine (02/13/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Gerry Thomas (02/13/04)
Re: GUI without resource files E P Chandler (02/13/04)
Re: I really did get burned today [LONG] Richard Maine (02/13/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Gerry Thomas (02/13/04)
Re: How to compile this? Kevin G. Rhoads (02/13/04)
Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/13/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Jugoslav Dujic (02/13/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Sreelal (02/13/04)
Re: GUI without resource files Richard Dell (02/13/04)
Re: xml parsers in fortran alex (02/13/04)
Re: How to compile this? Klaus Wacker (02/13/04)
Re: Liscense Manager Kelvin Hales (02/13/04)
Re: How to compile this? Bart Vandewoestyne (02/13/04)
Re: Is this legal Fortran code? Tom Micevski (02/13/04)
Is this legal Fortran code? Tim Hultberg (02/13/04)
Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) Georg Bauhaus (02/13/04)
Re: Itanium2/Xeon64/Opteron Tim Prince (02/13/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions bv (02/13/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Albert Herman (02/13/04)
Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) James Rogers (02/13/04)
Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) Greg Lindahl (02/13/04)
Re: Character substrings mcalhoun_at_ksu.edu (02/13/04)
Re: How to compile this? miller (02/13/04)
Re: Liscense Manager easylm (02/13/04)
Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) MSG (02/13/04)
Re: Itanium2/Xeon64/Opteron Free (02/12/04)
Re: null pointer check on Linux Håkan Lane (02/12/04)
How to compile this? Bart Vandewoestyne (02/12/04)
Re: My subset selection software in Fortran Scott Czepiel (02/12/04)
Re: A basic, vexing question about lunits and file descriptors John Harper (02/12/04)
Re: FORMAT(1X, A9999) maximum length for A format? Richard Maine (02/12/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/12/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Gerry Thomas (02/12/04)
FORMAT(1X, A9999) maximum length for A format? Dan McKinley (02/12/04)
Re: null pointer check on Linux Richard Maine (02/12/04)
Re: null pointer check on Linux Paul van Delst (02/12/04)
Re: null pointer check on Linux Richard Maine (02/12/04)
Re: to calculate execution time in Fortran 77 Tim Prince (02/12/04)
Re: null pointer check on Linux Paul van Delst (02/12/04)
Re: null pointer check on Linux David Ham (02/12/04)
Re: null pointer check on Linux Michael Metcalf (02/12/04)
Re: null pointer check on Linux Richard Maine (02/12/04)
null pointer check on Linux Håkan Lane (02/12/04)
Re: My subset selection software in Fortran Richard Maine (02/12/04)
Re: A basic, vexing question about lunits and file descriptors Steve Lionel (02/12/04)
Re: Specifying type of literal integer constants Steve Lionel (02/12/04)
Re: A basic, vexing question about lunits and file descriptors Richard Maine (02/12/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Gerry Thomas (02/12/04)
Re: My subset selection software in Fortran beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/12/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? Gerry Thomas (02/12/04)
Re: to calculate execution time in Fortran 77 David Ham (02/12/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? André Janz (02/12/04)
to calculate execution time in Fortran 77 balupari (02/12/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Jugoslav Dujic (02/12/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Gerry Thomas (02/12/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions David Frank (02/12/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Sreelal (02/12/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Gerry Thomas (02/12/04)
Re: preconvert Dan Nagle (02/12/04)
Re: Specifying type of literal integer constants André Janz (02/12/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Giulia Paramour (02/12/04)
Re: Liscense Manager B52B_at_pl (02/12/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! David Jones (02/12/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Catherine Rees Lay (02/12/04)
Re: high precision on low values Les (02/12/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Robert Corbett (02/12/04)
Re: xml parsers in fortran Arjen Markus (02/12/04)
Re: A basic, vexing question about lunits and file descriptors TimC (02/12/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users bv (02/12/04)
Re: A basic, vexing question about lunits and file descriptors Richard Maine (02/12/04)
Re: STOP and continuation -- Re: multi-line strings Donald Arseneau (02/12/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Robert Corbett (02/12/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Albert Herman (02/12/04)
Re: multi-line strings John Harper (02/12/04)
Re: Fortran suspending execution Puneet (02/12/04)
Re: NAG Fortran 95 has some F2003 features Richard Maine (02/12/04)
Re: STOP and continuation -- Re: multi-line strings Richard Maine (02/12/04)
Re: NAG Fortran 95 has some F2003 features Bill Blum (02/12/04)
Re: STOP and continuation -- Re: multi-line strings Gordon Sande (02/12/04)
WOMPAT 2004 (CALL FOR PAPERS) Laksono Adhianto (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings Walt Brainerd (02/11/04)
Re: preconvert glen herrmannsfeldt (02/11/04)
RE: Need Help with Precision!! meek_at_skyway.usask.ca (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings James Giles (02/11/04)
Re: preconvert Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: I really did get burned today [LONG] Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: preconvert glen herrmannsfeldt (02/11/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! glen herrmannsfeldt (02/11/04)
Re: I really did get burned today [LONG] glen herrmannsfeldt (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings Richard Maine (02/11/04)
STOP and continuation -- Re: multi-line strings Kevin G. Rhoads (02/11/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Paul van Delst (02/11/04)
Re: high precision on low values glen herrmannsfeldt (02/11/04)
Re: high precision on low values Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: Fortran suspending execution glen herrmannsfeldt (02/11/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 glen herrmannsfeldt (02/11/04)
Re: Need Help with Precision!! Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings Walt Brainerd (02/11/04)
Re: CVF 6.6B - slow calculation speed Alexei Cioina (02/11/04)
Re: ifc 7.1 & FFTW Version 3 Steven G. Johnson (02/11/04)
high precision on low values Harshal (02/11/04)
Need Help with Precision!! Vihang (02/11/04)
Re: Fortran suspending execution Greg Chien (02/11/04)
Re: numerical library vendors don't use C++ Bill (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings Michael Metcalf (02/11/04)
Re: Specifying type of literal integer constants Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings Richard Maine (02/11/04)
NAG Fortran 95 has some F2003 features beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/11/04)
Re: Fortran suspending execution Puneet (02/11/04)
Re: Specifying type of literal integer constants Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: Specifying type of literal integer constants Steve Lionel (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings Rich Townsend (02/11/04)
Re: Specifying type of literal integer constants André Janz (02/11/04)
Re: Specifying type of literal integer constants Steve Lionel (02/11/04)
Re: CVF6.6C memory leak Steve Lionel (02/11/04)
Specifying type of literal integer constants André Janz (02/11/04)
Re: xml parsers in fortran David Ham (02/11/04)
CVF6.6C memory leak alexander chupeev (02/11/04)
Re: Liscense Manager Tony Jay (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings Richard Maine (02/11/04)
xml parsers in fortran alex (02/11/04)
Re: preconvert Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings Michael Metcalf (02/11/04)
Re: I really did get burned today [LONG] Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: GUI without resource files Ken Plotkin (02/11/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Gerry Thomas (02/11/04)
Re: Liscense Manager Randy Mackie (02/11/04)
Re: GUI without resource files Gary Scott (02/11/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Kevin G. Rhoads (02/11/04)
Re: multi-line strings Rich Townsend (02/11/04)
Re: passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Jugoslav Dujic (02/11/04)
multi-line strings Ed (02/11/04)
Liscense Manager Bernd Fischer (02/11/04)
passing file unit numbers to DLL functions Sreelal (02/11/04)
Re: GUI without resource files Catherine Rees Lay (02/11/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Steve Lionel (02/11/04)
Re: ifc 7.1 & FFTW Version 3 Helge Kreutzmann (02/11/04)
Re: GUI without resource files Tony Jay (02/11/04)
Re: Binary Module Format Changes Gordon Sande (02/11/04)
Re: CVF 6.6B Q_slow_calculation_speed?= B52B_at_pl (02/11/04)
Re: GUI without resource files Jugoslav Dujic (02/11/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Claus Pedersen (02/11/04)
Re: CVF 6.6B - slow calculation speed Michael Metcalf (02/11/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Claus Pedersen (02/11/04)
CVF 6.6B – slow calculation speed Alexei Cioina (02/11/04)
Re: preconvert Dan Nagle (02/11/04)
Fortran 77 manual Fujitsu mainframe Ed (02/11/04)
Re: GUI without resource files Arjen Markus (02/11/04)
GUI without resource files Richard Dell (02/11/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Giulia Paramour (02/11/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Catherine Rees Lay (02/11/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Richard Edgar (02/11/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Giulia Paramour (02/11/04)
Re: I really did get burned today [LONG] James Van Buskirk (02/11/04)
Re: Bug in Sun complier Robert Corbett (02/11/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 glen herrmannsfeldt (02/11/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler glen herrmannsfeldt (02/11/04)
netlib - Jan '04 ts (02/11/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler TimC (02/11/04)
Re: Bug in Sun complier Rich Townsend (02/11/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Bob Lidral (02/11/04)
Re: Binary Module Format Changes Gary L. Scott (02/11/04)
Re: A tale of three Sun's Robert Corbett (02/11/04)
Re: CVF 6.6B/C LINK.EXE Hang Gary L. Scott (02/11/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Robert Corbett (02/11/04)
Re: Bug in Sun complier Robert Corbett (02/11/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Ken Plotkin (02/11/04)
Re: Fortran suspending execution Steve Lionel (02/11/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Rich Townsend (02/11/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Tom Micevski (02/11/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Richard Maine (02/11/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/11/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? Greg Chien (02/11/04)
Re: Fortran suspending execution Greg Chien (02/11/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Greg Chien (02/11/04)
suspending program execution Puneet (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran suspending execution Rich Townsend (02/10/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Richard Maine (02/10/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Giulia Paramour (02/10/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? Richard Maine (02/10/04)
Fortran suspending execution Puneet (02/10/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Claus Pedersen (02/10/04)
Re: Sun bug reports Giulia Paramour (02/10/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? Dan Nagle (02/10/04)
Re: I really did get burned today [LONG] Richard Maine (02/10/04)
Sun bug reports Rich Townsend (02/10/04)
Re: f2f90 Michael Metcalf (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/10/04)
Re: f2f90 Richard Maine (02/10/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Mr. Adam Burry (02/10/04)
Re: Character Function James Van Buskirk (02/10/04)
f2f90 Mr. Adam Burry (02/10/04)
preconvert Mr. Adam Burry (02/10/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Steve Lionel (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/10/04)
Re: Bug in Sun complier Rich Townsend (02/10/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? James Giles (02/10/04)
Re: Binary Module Format Changes Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/10/04)
Binary Module Format Changes Gary Scott (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Tom Micevski (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Pierre Asselin (02/10/04)
Re: Bug in Sun complier Richard Maine (02/10/04)
Re: Character substrings Richard Maine (02/10/04)
Re: Character substrings Richard Maine (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Pierre Asselin (02/10/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? Greg Chien (02/10/04)
Re: Character substrings Pierre Asselin (02/10/04)
Re: A tale of three Sun's glen herrmannsfeldt (02/10/04)
old Fortran compilers (was Re: Character substrings) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/10/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Giulia Paramour (02/10/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Paul van Delst (02/10/04)
Re: Dynamic "PARAMETER" statement Paul van Delst (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/10/04)
Re: F77 vs F95 Herman D. Knoble (02/10/04)
Re: A tale of three Sun's Paul van Delst (02/10/04)
Re: format and f95 Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/10/04)
Re: Another bug in Sun's compiler Rich Townsend (02/10/04)
Re: Character Function beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/10/04)
F77 vs F95 Mr. Adam Burry (02/10/04)
Re: Dynamic "PARAMETER" statement beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/10/04)
Re: format and f95 Mr. Adam Burry (02/10/04)
Another bug in Sun's compiler Giulia Paramour (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Giulia Paramour (02/10/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II David Ham (02/10/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Giulia Paramour (02/10/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Giulia Paramour (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Tom Micevski (02/10/04)
Re: A tale of three Sun's Catherine Rees Lay (02/10/04)
Re: Character substrings Catherine Rees Lay (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/10/04)
Re: Dynamic "PARAMETER" statement Jugoslav Dujic (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/10/04)
Re: Dynamic "PARAMETER" statement Michael Metcalf (02/10/04)
Re: Bug in Sun complier Michael Metcalf (02/10/04)
Re: Character Function Michel OLAGNON (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Tom Micevski (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/10/04)
Re: Character substrings Tim Prince (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Walter Spector (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/10/04)
Re: Character substrings Dan Tex1 (02/10/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? bv (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/10/04)
Re: Character Function James Van Buskirk (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Tom Micevski (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i glen herrmannsfeldt (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Eric J. Kostelich (02/10/04)
Re: Character substrings mcalhoun_at_ksu.edu (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/10/04)
Dynamic "PARAMETER" statement Arindam Chakraborty (02/10/04)
Bug in Sun complier Rich Townsend (02/10/04)
Re: format and f95 glen herrmannsfeldt (02/10/04)
Re: A tale of three Sun's John Harper (02/10/04)
Re: Character substrings Richard Maine (02/10/04)
Re: Character substrings Donald Arseneau (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Rich Townsend (02/10/04)
Re: COMPLEX <-> REAL kind values Richard Maine (02/10/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/10/04)
COMPLEX <-> REAL kind values Rich Townsend (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Ken Fairfield (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: xlf90 link problem on OS X Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: CVF, Absoft bug involving ELEMENTAL character functions Steve Lionel (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/09/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Steve Lionel (02/09/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Steve Lionel (02/09/04)
Re: format and f95 Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: format and f95 Walt Brainerd (02/09/04)
Re: Mixing Fortran Common Variables with C : How to get rid of warning messages Pierre Asselin (02/09/04)
Re: format and f95 Walt Brainerd (02/09/04)
xlf90 link problem on OS X Liam Gumley (02/09/04)
Re: format and f95 Michael Metcalf (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/09/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Harald Anlauf (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i jeffrey templon (02/09/04)
format and f95 Mr. Adam Burry (02/09/04)
Re: Mixing Fortran Common Variables with C : How to get rid of warning messages Herman D. Knoble (02/09/04)
Re: Mixing Fortran Common Variables with C : How to get rid of warning messages E. Robert Tisdale (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/09/04)
Mixing Fortran Common Variables with C : How to get rid of warning messages Christopher M. Lusardi (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Claus Pedersen (02/09/04)
numerical library vendors don't use C++ beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Grant (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/09/04)
Re: Dimensional analysis / units checking and conversion during compilation Grant (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: Legality of USE to swap names Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: Legality of USE to swap names Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/09/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Giulia Paramour (02/09/04)
Re: Legality of USE to swap names Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: Proper USEing in F Walt Brainerd (02/09/04)
Re: Character substrings Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? Les (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/09/04)
Re: Legality of USE to swap names Jugoslav Dujic (02/09/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Gerry Thomas (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Duane Bozarth (02/09/04)
Database Steve (02/09/04)
Re: Legality of USE to swap names Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Dan Nagle (02/09/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? Catherine Rees Lay (02/09/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II David Ham (02/09/04)
Re: why does Fortran 95 require DEALLOCATE? David Ham (02/09/04)
Re: Dimensional analysis / units checking and conversion during compilation Arjen Markus (02/09/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Harald Anlauf (02/09/04)
Re: Character substrings Dan Tex1 (02/09/04)
Re: Segmentation fault Rob (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Tim Prince (02/09/04)
Re: IFC - cabs() ?? Richard Maine (02/09/04)
Re: Variable Length Arrays glen herrmannsfeldt (02/09/04)
Re: Character substrings TimC (02/09/04)
Re: Variable Length Arrays Dave Thompson (02/09/04)
Re: Character substrings James Van Buskirk (02/09/04)
Re: Character substrings glen herrmannsfeldt (02/09/04)
Character substrings TimC (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/09/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Steve Lionel (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/09/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i glen herrmannsfeldt (02/09/04)
Re: IFC - cabs() ?? Rich Townsend (02/09/04)
Re: IFC - cabs() ?? Rich Townsend (02/09/04)
Re: IFC - cabs() ?? James Van Buskirk (02/09/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Giulia Paramour (02/09/04)
Re: IFC - cabs() ?? James Van Buskirk (02/09/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? John Harper (02/08/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Steve Lionel (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i glen herrmannsfeldt (02/08/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Giulia Paramour (02/08/04)
CVF, Absoft bug involving ELEMENTAL character functions beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/08/04)
Re: Dimensional analysis / units checking and conversion during compilation John Harper (02/08/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Harald Anlauf (02/08/04)
Intel Fortran 8 for Windows and Matlab mex files [1/1] Andrew McLean (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i _at_(none) (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/08/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Giulia Paramour (02/08/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Giulia Paramour (02/08/04)
Re: High Performance Fortran Fabian Braennstroem (02/08/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? (was: Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?]) Gerry Thomas (02/08/04)
Re: Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Richard Maine (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/08/04)
Re: why does Fortran 95 require DEALLOCATE? Richard Maine (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Duane Bozarth (02/08/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? Rich Townsend (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Richard Maine (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/08/04)
Intel ifort compiler problem - part II Giulia Paramour (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Dan Nagle (02/08/04)
Re: Laptop processor benchmarks: Centrino Pentium M vs Mobile Pentium IV ??? Alex Gibson (02/08/04)
Re: Bug, out of standard or human error? --==M=M==-- (02/08/04)
Re: Bug, out of standard or human error? --==M=M==-- (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Giulia Paramour (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Giulia Paramour (02/08/04)
why does Fortran 95 require DEALLOCATE? beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Danguard (02/08/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? (was: Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?]) Gordon Sande (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Dan Nagle (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i glen herrmannsfeldt (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/08/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? E. Robert Tisdale (02/08/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? Rich Townsend (02/08/04)
Re: allocatable result of a function Rich Townsend (02/08/04)
Re: leave the amateurs alone Rich Townsend (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/08/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? E. Robert Tisdale (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Ken Plotkin (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Rich Townsend (02/08/04)
Re: destructors in Fortran 03? Rich Townsend (02/08/04)
I really did get burned today [LONG] James Van Buskirk (02/08/04)
allocatable result of a function beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/08/04)
destructors in Fortran 03? E. Robert Tisdale (02/08/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? (was: Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?]) Gerry Thomas (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/08/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/08/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? Richard Maine (02/07/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? (was: Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?]) James Giles (02/07/04)
disabling crtl-c fiammetta (02/07/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Eric J. Kostelich (02/07/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? (was: Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?]) John W. Eaton (02/07/04)
Re: Dimensional analysis / units checking and conversion during compilation Ron Davis (02/07/04)
Re: How to use heap? Richard Maine (02/07/04)
Re: How to use heap? Michael Metcalf (02/07/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/07/04)
How to use heap? --==M=M==-- (02/07/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Jugoslav Dujic (02/07/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Dan Nagle (02/07/04)
Re: High Performance Fortran Michael Metcalf (02/07/04)
Re: standard conformance Dan Nagle (02/07/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? Bill Blum (02/07/04)
Re: xlf / nag / ifort / pgf90 vs g95 / sun f90 / ifc 7.1 Michael Metcalf (02/07/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? Richard Maine (02/07/04)
Re: Is Fortran a legal system or religion? (was: Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?]) James Giles (02/07/04)
Is Fortran a legal system or religion? (was: Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?]) John W. Eaton (02/07/04)
Re: leave the amateurs alone Richard Maine (02/07/04)
Re: leave the amateurs alone Gordon Sande (02/07/04)
leave the amateurs alone beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/07/04)
Re: Laptop processor benchmarks: Centrino Pentium M vs Mobile Pentium IV ??? Steve Lionel (02/07/04)
Re: standard conformance bv (02/07/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/07/04)
Re: code checking bv (02/07/04)
Re: ifc 7.1 & FFTW Version 3 Steven G. Johnson (02/07/04)
Re: Compiler bug? Gus Gassmann (02/06/04)
Re: Bug, out of standard or human error? Gerry Thomas (02/06/04)
Re: Compiler bug? glen herrmannsfeldt (02/06/04)
Re: xlf / nag / ifort / pgf90 vs g95 / sun f90 / ifc 7.1 Paul van Delst (02/06/04)
Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?] Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?] glen herrmannsfeldt (02/06/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: Compiler bug? Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i James Giles (02/06/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug glen herrmannsfeldt (02/06/04)
Compiler bug? Gus Gassmann (02/06/04)
Re: xlf / nag / ifort / pgf90 vs g95 / sun f90 / ifc 7.1 Jugoslav Dujic (02/06/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: code checking glen herrmannsfeldt (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: xlf / nag / ifort / pgf90 vs g95 / sun f90 / ifc 7.1 Paul van Delst (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Paul van Delst (02/06/04)
Re: xlf / nag / ifort / pgf90 vs g95 / sun f90 / ifc 7.1 Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: Bug, out of standard or human error? Richard Maine (02/06/04)
xlf / nag / ifort / pgf90 vs g95 / sun f90 / ifc 7.1 Joost VandeVondele (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Ken Plotkin (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Ken Plotkin (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i John W. Eaton (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/06/04)
Re: Bug, out of standard or human error? Michel OLAGNON (02/06/04)
Re: Bug, out of standard or human error? Gerry Thomas (02/06/04)
Bug, out of standard or human error? --==M=M==-- (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i E. Robert Tisdale (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Gerry Thomas (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: Legality of USE to swap names Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: standard conformance Gerry Thomas (02/06/04)
Re: ifc 7.1 & FFTW Version 3 Bill Blum (02/06/04)
Re: standard conformance Paul van Delst (02/06/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Pierre Asselin (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Catherine Rees Lay (02/06/04)
Re: standard conformance Jugoslav Dujic (02/06/04)
Re: standard conformance Duane Bozarth (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Greg Chien (02/06/04)
Re: Dimensional analysis / units checking and conversion during compilation Gordon Sande (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Dan Nagle (02/06/04)
Re: code checking Bill Blum (02/06/04)
Legality of USE to swap names James Cownie (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Claus Pedersen (02/06/04)
Re: code checking Catherine Rees Lay (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Catherine Rees Lay (02/06/04)
Re: ifc 7.1 & FFTW Version 3 Helge Kreutzmann (02/06/04)
Re: Laptop processor benchmarks: Centrino Pentium M vs Mobile Pentium IV ??? Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/06/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/06/04)
Re: standard conformance Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/06/04)
Re: Laptop processor benchmarks: Centrino Pentium M vs Mobile Pentium IV ??? Helge Avlesen (02/06/04)
Re: code checking Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: code checking tachyon (02/06/04)
code checking tachyon (02/06/04)
Re: Salford compiler: Assigning a value to a constant expression is invalid Donald Arseneau (02/06/04)
Re: Laptop processor benchmarks: Centrino Pentium M vs Mobile Pentium IV ??? user_at_domain.invalid (02/06/04)
Re: Dimensional analysis / units checking and conversion during compilation Ron Davis (02/06/04)
Re: standard conformance Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: xlf 8.1: "Error in P3_FSTM. Call service representative." Dave Seaman (02/06/04)
Re: standard conformance glen herrmannsfeldt (02/06/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Aidan (02/06/04)
Re: standard conformance Richard Maine (02/06/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/05/04)
Re: ifc 7.1 & FFTW Version 3 Steven G. Johnson (02/05/04)
Re: standard conformance Paul van Delst (02/05/04)
Re: standard conformance Richard Maine (02/05/04)
Re: standard conformance beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Giulia Paramour (02/05/04)
Re: xlf 8.1: "Error in P3_FSTM. Call service representative." Richard Maine (02/05/04)
Re: newbie question fortran analog for #ifdef/#ifndef,conditional compilationpossibility Scott Hawley (02/05/04)
xlf 8.1: "Error in P3_FSTM. Call service representative." Scott Hawley (02/05/04)
Re: Segmentation fault LeoPardo (02/05/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Duane Bozarth (02/05/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/05/04)
ifc 7.1 & FFTW Version 3 Helge Kreutzmann (02/05/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Ken Plotkin (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program Richard Maine (02/05/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Bob Lidral (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) Richard Maine (02/05/04)
Re: Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) Richard Maine (02/05/04)
Re: Segmentation fault Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/05/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/05/04)
Re: Salford compiler: Assigning a value to a constant expression is invalid Richard Maine (02/05/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/05/04)
Fortran vs. C++ : Which is best to choose now i Paula (02/05/04)
Re: Segmentation fault David Ham (02/05/04)
Re: Laptop processor benchmarks: Centrino Pentium M vs Mobile Pentium IV ??? Herman D. Knoble (02/05/04)
Re: Segmentation fault Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program glen herrmannsfeldt (02/05/04)
Re: Segmentation fault David Ham (02/05/04)
Re: Segmentation fault David Ham (02/05/04)
Re: Laptop processor benchmarks: Centrino Pentium M vs Mobile Pentium IV ??? David Ham (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program Herman D. Knoble (02/05/04)
Re: Segmentation fault Duane Bozarth (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) Paul van Delst (02/05/04)
Re: Segmentation fault Jugoslav Dujic (02/05/04)
RE: Segmentation fault meek_at_skyway.usask.ca (02/05/04)
Segmentation fault LeoPardo (02/05/04)
Re: newbie question fortran analog for #ifdef/#ifndef,conditional compilationpossibility Duane Bozarth (02/05/04)
Re: Laptop processor benchmarks: Centrino Pentium M vs Mobile Pentium IV ??? beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/05/04)
newbie question fortran analog for #ifdef/#ifndef,conditional compilation possibility Anton Ishmurzin (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program Tim Prince (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program Tim Prince (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) Pierre Asselin (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Keith Refson - real email address in signature (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Giulia Paramour (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program B52B_at_pl (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Giulia Paramour (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program John Mansell (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Catherine Rees Lay (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) Jugoslav Dujic (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler David Ham (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Giulia Paramour (02/05/04)
Re: High Performance Fortran Fabian Braennstroem (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program glen herrmannsfeldt (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) glen herrmannsfeldt (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Richard Maine (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) Richard Maine (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Tom Micevski (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program John Harper (02/05/04)
Laptop processor benchmarks: Centrino Pentium M vs Mobile Pentium IV ??? user_at_domain.invalid (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Giulia Paramour (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Giulia Paramour (02/05/04)
Re: Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program glen herrmannsfeldt (02/05/04)
Re: Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler James Van Buskirk (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) glen herrmannsfeldt (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) Robert Corbett (02/05/04)
Re: Dimensional analysis / units checking and conversion during compilation Grant W. Petty (02/05/04)
Problem with Intel ifort (ifc) 8.0 compiler Giulia Paramour (02/05/04)
Salford95 and Lahey-Fujitsu Compiler producing different output with same program jakeh (02/05/04)
Re: High Performance Fortran Tom Micevski (02/05/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) James Giles (02/05/04)
High Performance Fortran Fabian Braennstroem (02/04/04)
Re: Salford compiler: Assigning a value to a constant expression is invalid Bil Kleb (02/04/04)
Re: Fortran 2003 new features PetitTrot (02/04/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) Paul van Delst (02/04/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) Ushnish Basu (02/04/04)
Re: INTENT(IN OUT) glen herrmannsfeldt (02/04/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Kevin G. Rhoads (02/04/04)
INTENT(IN OUT) beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/04/04)
Re: DO loop standards question. Richard Maine (02/04/04)
Re: Is this standard f90? Jason (02/04/04)
Re: Salford compiler: Assigning a value to a constant expression is invalid Herman D. Knoble (02/04/04)
Fortran 2003 new features beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/04/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Greg Chien (02/04/04)
Re: Salford compiler: Assigning a value to a constant expression is invalid Bil Kleb (02/04/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Greg Chien (02/04/04)
Re: NetCDF 3.5 memory limitation (?) w/ ifc and pgf90 Paul van Delst (02/04/04)
Re: Intel Visual Fortran V8 (IA-32): What do I need to link? Stephan Petersen (02/04/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Theodore W. Hall (02/04/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there anyothers? David Ham (02/04/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/04/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there anyothers? Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/04/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/04/04)
Re: DO loop standards question. Michel OLAGNON (02/04/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? E P Chandler (02/04/04)
Re: Is this standard f90? Richard Maine (02/04/04)
Re: Is this standard f90? James Giles (02/04/04)
Re: Is this standard f90? Richard Maine (02/04/04)
Re: Is this standard f90? James Giles (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Clive Page (02/03/04)
Re: Size of Largest Array? Greg Lindahl (02/03/04)
Re: Size of Largest Array? Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: Size of Largest Array? Claus Pedersen (02/03/04)
Re: Size of Largest Array? TLowe (02/03/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? Kevin G. Rhoads (02/03/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users James Giles (02/03/04)
Re: Is this standard f90? Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: DO loop standards question. Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? Brian Howie (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: Seeking F90 compiler for P IV under Linux -- Thanks! Urtzi Jauregi (02/03/04)
Re: [Ignore it - Sorry] Riuso componenti sviluppati con .NET Danguard (02/03/04)
Riuso componenti sviluppati con .NET Danguard (02/03/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/03/04)
Re: Is this standard f90? Arjen Markus (02/03/04)
Is this standard f90? Jason (02/03/04)
Re: Intel Visual Fortran V8 (IA-32): What do I need to link? Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/03/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/03/04)
Re: Intel Visual Fortran V8 (IA-32): What do I need to link? Steve Lionel (02/03/04)
Intel Visual Fortran V8 (IA-32): What do I need to link? Stephan Petersen (02/03/04)
Re: ifc 6.0 - where to get? Anton Ishmurzin (02/03/04)
Re: ifc 6.0 - where to get? Anton Ishmurzin (02/03/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/03/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? Gordon Sande (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Les (02/03/04)
The Data Compression Library B52B_at_pl (02/03/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? Andrew Smith (02/03/04)
Re: DO loop standards question. James Cownie (02/03/04)
Re: Run-time error when "Multiline" edit box property used in DVF 6.0 Jugoslav Dujic (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" #Harold Stevens US.972.952.3293 (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Andy Nelson (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug glen herrmannsfeldt (02/03/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users bv (02/03/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? Steven G. Kargl (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug James Van Buskirk (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug glen herrmannsfeldt (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Gerry Thomas (02/03/04)
Re: fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? J. F. Cornwall (02/03/04)
fortran compilers -- i've found one that works, are there any others? jakeh (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug John Harper (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" James Giles (02/03/04)
Re: Creating a pipe with IFC Madhusudan Singh (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" TimC (02/03/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug James Van Buskirk (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Dr Chaos (02/03/04)
Re: inline assembler Manfred Hauser (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Dr Chaos (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" John Harper (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Greg Lindahl (02/03/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Gerry Thomas (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug John Harper (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" James Giles (02/02/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users James Giles (02/02/04)
Re: Proper USEing in F Harald Anlauf (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: appending to a char John Harper (02/02/04)
Re: appending to a char Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug glen herrmannsfeldt (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: byte table? John Hunter (02/02/04)
appending to a char Kevin (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug James Giles (02/02/04)
Re: Creating a pipe with IFC Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug glen herrmannsfeldt (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Steve Lionel (02/02/04)
Re: Creating a pipe with IFC Steve Lionel (02/02/04)
Re: byte table? glen herrmannsfeldt (02/02/04)
Re: Creating a pipe with IFC Madhusudan Singh (02/02/04)
Re: F and G95 Andy Vaught (02/02/04)
Re: C routines for Special Functions beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/02/04)
Re: Proper USEing in F Sebastian Gallinat (02/02/04)
Re: Proper USEing in F Sebastian Gallinat (02/02/04)
Re: High Performance Query Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: Run-time error when "Multiline" edit box property used in DVF 6.0 Steve Lionel (02/02/04)
Re: Proper USEing in F John Wingate (02/02/04)
Run-time error when "Multiline" edit box property used in DVF 6.0 Steve Kramer (02/02/04)
Re: byte table? Richard Maine (02/02/04)
High Performance Query Dr Margaret MacDougall (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Dan Nagle (02/02/04)
Re: DO loop standards question. Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: Preprocessor directives ? Dan Nagle (02/02/04)
Re: ifc 6.0 - where to get? Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: pure - parallel Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: Sun f90 compiler bug. Help. Paul van Delst (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug glen herrmannsfeldt (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: ifc 6.0 - where to get? David Ham (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" William Clodius (02/02/04)
byte table? John Hunter (02/02/04)
Re: Salford compiler: Assigning a value to a constant expression is invalid Herman D. Knoble (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: DO loop standards question. Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/02/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users Bob Lidral (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Gordon Sande (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Gordon Sande (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran compiler for Opteron with OpenMP Tabon (02/02/04)
Re: inline assembler Tim Prince (02/02/04)
Re: DO loop standards question. robin (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Tim Prince (02/02/04)
DO loop standards question. James Cownie (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Tim Prince (02/02/04)
pure - parallel B52B_at_pl (02/02/04)
ifc 6.0 - where to get? Anton Ishmurzin (02/02/04)
Dimensional analysis / units checking and conversion during compilation Ron Davis (02/02/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users Arjen Markus (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Les (02/02/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users Jugoslav Dujic (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran and our Managers and reality Alexei Cioina (02/02/04)
Re: internal READ from a CHARACTER array? Catherine Rees Lay (02/02/04)
Re: inline assembler Manfred Hauser (02/02/04)
Re: Itanium2/Xeon64/Opteron Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/02/04)
Re: F and G95 Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/02/04)
Re: Size of Largest Array? Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/02/04)
Re: fortran and columns Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/02/04)
Re: Variable Length Arrays Jan C. Vorbrüggen (02/02/04)
Re: Preprocessor directives ? David Ham (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Arjen Markus (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug James Giles (02/02/04)
Re: Variable Length Arrays Dave Thompson (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug glen herrmannsfeldt (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug Richard Maine (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug James Giles (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" glen herrmannsfeldt (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Norbert Juffa (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Tim Prince (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" leslie (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Tim Prince (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Steve Lionel (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug glen herrmannsfeldt (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" James Giles (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Robert Corbett (02/02/04)
Re: NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug James Giles (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Dylan Sung (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" TimC (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" TimC (02/02/04)
Re: Creating a pipe with IFC TimC (02/02/04)
NAG, Sun, Compaq possible f95 bug John Harper (02/02/04)
Re: Itanium2/Xeon64/Opteron glen herrmannsfeldt (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" glen herrmannsfeldt (02/02/04)
Re: Fortran and our Managers and reality Bill Blum (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" John Harper (02/01/04)
Proper USEing in F Harald Anlauf (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Ken Plotkin (02/01/04)
Re: Itanium2/Xeon64/Opteron Greg Lindahl (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Ken Plotkin (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" James Giles (02/01/04)
Re: Salford compiler: Assigning a value to a constant expression is invalid Richard Maine (02/01/04)
Re: Itanium2/Xeon64/Opteron Richard Maine (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Clive Page (02/01/04)
Re: internal READ from a CHARACTER array? Richard Maine (02/01/04)
Fortran and our Managers and reality West Coast Engineering (02/01/04)
Itanium2/Xeon64/Opteron Mayer Humi (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Toon Moene (02/01/04)
internal READ from a CHARACTER array? beliavsky_at_aol.com (02/01/04)
Re: Preprocessor directives ? Tim Prince (02/01/04)
Re: inline assembler Tim Prince (02/01/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users Tim Prince (02/01/04)
Re: Preprocessor directives ? Dan Nagle (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran compiler for Opteron with OpenMP Bil Kleb (02/01/04)
Salford compiler: Assigning a value to a constant expression is invalid Bil Kleb (02/01/04)
inline assembler Manfred Hauser (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Robert Corbett (02/01/04)
Re: F and G95 Robert Corbett (02/01/04)
Re: F and G95 Robert Corbett (02/01/04)
Re: Help from fellow Fortran Users Bob Lidral (02/01/04)
Re: CVF 6.6B/C LINK.EXE Hang Gary L. Scott (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" James Giles (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Walt Brainerd (02/01/04)
Re: F and G95 Walt Brainerd (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Steve Lionel (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" PetitTrot (02/01/04)
Re: Preprocessor directives ? Tim Prince (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" Robert Corbett (02/01/04)
Re: Preprocessor directives ? James Giles (02/01/04)
Re: Fortran - a "technology that refuses to die" James Giles (02/01/04)
Re: F and G95 Jason Nielsen (01/31/04)
Re: Bugs at my web site Clive Page (01/31/04)
Re: Fortran compiler for Opteron with OpenMP Steve Lionel (01/31/04)
Re: Is there a strategy for multiplatform builds and distributions? beliavsky_at_aol.com (01/31/04)

Last message date: 02/29/04
Archived on: 02/29/04 CET

1546 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

comp.lang.fortranBy Date

comp.lang.fortran
By Date