Re: Use of subroutines
From: Greg Chien (gchien_at_n.o.S.p.a.m.protodesign-inc.com)
Date: 03/05/04
- Next message: Gordon Sande: "Re: [OT] Tom Cole on Google"
- Previous message: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: How to allocate variable in f90 subroutine and pass it to c program?"
- In reply to: Pierre Asselin: "Re: Use of subroutines"
- Next in thread: Kevin G. Rhoads: "Re: Use of subroutines"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:54:14 GMT
"Pierre Asselin" wrote
> Your posts addressed the deeper issue of knowing what to encapsulate.
> I now think that design by iterative refinement, starting with
> linear code and factoring out subroutines (or data structures or
> classes or whatever) per your 3 guidelines plus my 4th is an
> excellent methodology. I still can't believe the list is so short.
I would recommend:
http://www.refactoring.com/catalog/index.html
As Fortran is getting more user-defined type features, I think the above
is getting more relevant.
-- Best Regards, Greg Chien e-mail: remove n.o.S.p.a.m. http://protodesign-inc.com
- Next message: Gordon Sande: "Re: [OT] Tom Cole on Google"
- Previous message: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: How to allocate variable in f90 subroutine and pass it to c program?"
- In reply to: Pierre Asselin: "Re: Use of subroutines"
- Next in thread: Kevin G. Rhoads: "Re: Use of subroutines"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|