Re: "Visual" Fortran?
From: Robert Baer (robertbaer_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 04/10/04
- Next message: Robert Baer: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- Previous message: Robert Baer: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- In reply to: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- Next in thread: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- Reply: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 07:59:25 GMT
beliavsky@aol.com wrote:
>
> Robert Baer <robertbaer@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<40766196.A595DEF2@earthlink.net>...
> > Is there such a beastie as an inexpensive "visual" Fortran compiler
> > (for WinDoz)?
> > I am working on a routine that eventually will need to be "ported"
> > into WinDoz: need to be ablr to control screen resolution on the fly,
> > use a mouse, and have pop-up text read/write boxes.
>
> See http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Languages/Fortran/Compilers/
> for a list of Fortran compilers. To make Windows programs, you could
> try Absoft, Compaq, Lahey, Intel, and Salford. Be aware that the
> developers of Compaq Visual Fortran have moved to Intel, and CVF may
> not be developed further. Some people here have expressed
> disappointment with the Windows capabilities of Intel Visual Fortran.
> Lahey and Salford support .NET.
Please be so kind as to enlighten this ignorant one: what is .NET. ?
- Next message: Robert Baer: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- Previous message: Robert Baer: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- In reply to: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- Next in thread: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- Reply: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: "Visual" Fortran?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|