Re: Compiler can't find modules!
From: Richard Maine (nospam_at_see.signature)
Date: 04/22/04
- Next message: kwgkxf_at_vf.shawcable.net: "My busty neighbour 471"
- Previous message: Jason Nielsen: "Re: testing programs in lapack does not run with ifc 7.1"
- In reply to: Paul Van Delst: "Re: Compiler can't find modules!"
- Next in thread: John Smith: "Re: Compiler can't find modules!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Apr 2004 13:00:56 -0700
Paul Van Delst <paul.vandelst@noaa.gov> writes:
> >>Richard Maine wrote:
> >>
> >>>It is at least vaguely possible that you might need a "-I." on
> >>>the command line, but normally that's implied.
> Not for AIX xlf v7 or v8.
...
> I meant that you don't need to specify "-I." for AIX xlf v7 or v8.
Ah. I see now. Problem with antecedents. (Us editor types are
familliar with confusions like that).
I took the "Not" to be referring to the imediately preceeding phrase,
the "but normally that's implied". Thus, I thought you were saying
that the "-I." was not implied in AIX. I now see that you were
instead referring to the first clause of the preceding sentence, rather
than the second clause, so you meant that the "-I." was not needed
on AIX (which is the same thing as saying that it *IS* implied).
-- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; email: my first.last at org.domain | experience comes from bad judgment. org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain
- Next message: kwgkxf_at_vf.shawcable.net: "My busty neighbour 471"
- Previous message: Jason Nielsen: "Re: testing programs in lapack does not run with ifc 7.1"
- In reply to: Paul Van Delst: "Re: Compiler can't find modules!"
- Next in thread: John Smith: "Re: Compiler can't find modules!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|