Re: Question on complex algebra
From: glen herrmannsfeldt (gah_at_ugcs.caltech.edu)
Date: 04/27/04
- Next message: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Question on complex algebra"
- Previous message: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Fortran memory allocation (stack/heap) issues"
- In reply to: Dr Chaos: "Re: Question on complex algebra"
- Next in thread: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Question on complex algebra"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:26:19 GMT
Dr Chaos wrote:
> AIMAG(Z) = 0.0
This was, unfortunately, discussed here before. PL/I uses
this form, and calls it a pseudo-variable. (Except that it
is IMAG instead of AIMAG.) There was a long discussion on
readability between the SUBSTR() form and Fortran substring
operations.
> does this interfere with statement functions?
It might. statement function definitions must be placed
early in the source file, but it could easily be confused.
PL/I doesn't have statement functions, and no user supplied
pseudo-variables, either.
It will probably be personal preference. The .r/.i form is
slightly more compact, and so probably slightly less hard to
read under some conditions.
-- glen
- Next message: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Question on complex algebra"
- Previous message: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Fortran memory allocation (stack/heap) issues"
- In reply to: Dr Chaos: "Re: Question on complex algebra"
- Next in thread: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Question on complex algebra"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]