Re: Polyhedron Benchmarks 2004
From: Alex Gibson (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 05/15/04
- Next message: Robert Corbett: "Re: sin(x) for large x"
- Previous message: Gerry Thomas: "Re: sin(x) for large x"
- In reply to: John Appleyard: "Polyhedron Benchmarks 2004"
- Next in thread: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Polyhedron Benchmarks 2004"
- Reply: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Polyhedron Benchmarks 2004"
- Reply: Matthew C Roberts: "Re: Polyhedron Benchmarks 2004"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 18:42:34 +1000
"John Appleyard" <spamtrap@polyhedron.com> wrote in message
news:409FDB91.1040303@polyhedron.com...
> I have just revised the compiler comparison charts at www.polyhedron.com.
>
> The execution time benchmarks have been substantially revised, with some
> old ones removed, others revised, and some new ones added. In addition,
> I've included the harness which we use to run the benchmarks, and a
> validator for checking the correctness of the output files. We do now
> encourage others to download and use the benchmarks, and to publish the
> results, providing that this is done without distortion, and with due
> acknowledgement to Polyhedron.
>
> The results include the latest versions of compilers from Absoft, Intel,
> Lahey, NAG, PGI and Salford, with all of these vendors showing some
> significant improvements, paticularly on F90 code. All run on a Dell
> Dimension 4600 with a 3.06GHz Pentium 4 and 768 MBytes RAM, dual booting
> Windows XP Pro and Red Hat 9.0. We plan to publish results for these
> benchmarks on a 64 bit AMD machine later this year.
>
What about a page comparing speed and diagnostics across both windows and
linux.
Know of a few people who would be interested.
Also why the different compiler switches
on different platforms ?
eg
absoft win32 ft95 %1 -02 -xINTEGER -stack:0x8000000
absoft linux f95 -03 -xINTEGER %1
also with the intel compiler.
Alex Gibson
- Next message: Robert Corbett: "Re: sin(x) for large x"
- Previous message: Gerry Thomas: "Re: sin(x) for large x"
- In reply to: John Appleyard: "Polyhedron Benchmarks 2004"
- Next in thread: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Polyhedron Benchmarks 2004"
- Reply: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Polyhedron Benchmarks 2004"
- Reply: Matthew C Roberts: "Re: Polyhedron Benchmarks 2004"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|