Tales for Intel

From: Gerry Thomas (gfthomas_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 05/28/04 

Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 14:25:02 -0400

You don't have to port from CVF to IVF: CVF is way and by far a more
robust, complete, and stable product than IVF.

If you go for IMSL 5, forget MKL, most of it is accessible via IMSL and
what's not is already part of IMSL. 

--
Ciao,
Gerry T.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: bye bye CVF
    ... When converting a CVF V6 project that uses the default CVF calling ... The Help button is not yet supported in the Fortran AppWizard ... > the Gold Standard in Fortran, it would appear that IVF doesn't even merit ... projects are backwardly compatible with L/F's IMSL 4.0. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Tales for Intel
    ... > You don't have to port from CVF to IVF: CVF is way and by far a more ... > robust, complete, and stable product than IVF. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Tales for Intel
    ... > You don't have to port from CVF to IVF: CVF is way and by far a more ... > robust, complete, and stable product than IVF. ...
    (sci.math.num-analysis)
  • Re: Intel Visual Fortran 9 released
    ... Today Abdul installed IVF 9 Pro. ... subscription of $650for IVF Pro, $450 goes to VNI for the IMSL ... The only difference between Intel Standard and Pro is IMSL; ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Compaq Visual Fortran discontinued: upgrade to Intel Visual Fortran?
    ... Is the integrated editor/debugger environment of IVF similar/different from CVF? ... Does windows-specific code compile ... lesser integration than CVF provided). ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)