Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?]
From: Greg Lindahl (lindahl_at_pbm.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Nicolas Lardjane: "Re: [Question:]Difference between PGF90 and Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6"
- Previous message: Rich Townsend: "Re: Allocatable vs pointer in procedure resolution"
- In reply to: Gary L. Scott: "Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?]"
- Next in thread: Gary Scott: "Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?]"
- Reply: Gary Scott: "Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Jul 2004 18:15:24 -0700
In article <41099621.871B7EA1@ev1.net>,
Gary L. Scott <garyscott@ev1.net> wrote:
>? I thought Z/OS was equivalent to MVS and OS/390?? I've never read
>anything about AIX hosted/supported under VM only Linux. Interesting.
This is the mainframe version of AIX -- I would be stunned if it ran
*without* VM.
-- g
- Next message: Nicolas Lardjane: "Re: [Question:]Difference between PGF90 and Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6"
- Previous message: Rich Townsend: "Re: Allocatable vs pointer in procedure resolution"
- In reply to: Gary L. Scott: "Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?]"
- Next in thread: Gary Scott: "Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?]"
- Reply: Gary Scott: "Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]