comp.lang.fortran
By Author

876 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 06/30/04
Ending: 07/31/04

• --==M=M==--
  • howto optimize this stupid subroutine (07/02/04)
• Aardpig
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/06/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
• Aart Bik
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/14/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/12/04)
• Aart J.C. Bik
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/15/04)
• Aidan
  • Re: maxloc/minloc functions (07/09/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
• Aleksandar B. Samardzic
  • ANN: GNU libmatheval 1.1.0 release (07/03/04)
• Alex Gibson
  • Re: microsoft express developer tools (07/03/04)
  • Re: microsoft express developer tools (07/03/04)
  • microsoft express developer tools (07/03/04)
• Alistair Maclean
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/11/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
• Alois Steindl
  • Re: Eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a general real matrix (07/08/04)
• Amit Bhatia
  • Can't understand the arguement list. (07/09/04)
• analyst41
  • To Gerry Thomas (07/04/04)
• And
  • Do you daydream about looking deep inside Marge Simpson's pussy? (07/19/04)
• Andreas Ernst
  • FORMAT in F77 (07/22/04)
• andy
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/31/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/28/04)
  • [Question:]Difference between PGF90 and Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6 (07/24/04)
  • [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/24/04)
• andy2o
  • Re: fortran equivalent to Matlab sparse matrix (07/01/04)
• Anton Ishmurzin
  • Re: Problem: Fortran and OpenMP on Intel Pentium IV 3.0 GHz (Toshiba Laptop) (07/16/04)
• Anton Strarikov
  • Re: fortran equivalent to Matlab sparse matrix (07/13/04)
• Arindam Chakraborty
  • Help :Writing potable unformated files in fortran (07/23/04)
  • Chess program in fortran (07/19/04)
• Arjen Markus
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/20/04)
  • Re: Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/19/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/19/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/14/04)
  • Re: image processing (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: Allocatable components (07/13/04)
  • Re: Newbie question (07/13/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/08/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/07/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/05/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
• ArmINVALID_at_bbcc.uk
  • Re: visualize images (07/28/04)
• Arto Huttunen
  • Re: static variables in fortran77? (07/08/04)
• Atmapuri
  • Re: Printf/Write callback! (07/20/04)
  • Printf/Write callback! (07/20/04)
• B52B
  • Re: Allocatable components (07/14/04)
  • Allocatable components (07/13/04)
  • Re: fortran equivalent to Matlab sparse matrix (07/01/04)
• Bastiaan Braams
  • Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/23/04)
• Bazip
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/06/04)
• beliavsky_at_aol.com
  • Re: passing an allocatable matrix in a subroutine to the main program (07/31/04)
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/30/04)
  • Re: newbie question: nag90 and lf95 (07/27/04)
  • Re: [Question:]Difference between PGF90 and Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6 (07/24/04)
  • Re: using random_number on a complex array (07/23/04)
  • Portland Group compiler now F95 (07/22/04)
  • add nonuniform RNG and special functions to Fortran? (07/21/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Chess program in fortran (07/19/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/18/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/14/04)
  • Re: Fortran Resources (July 2004) (07/13/04)
  • Re: fortran equivalent to Matlab sparse matrix (07/13/04)
  • Re: Newbie question (07/13/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/12/04)
  • Re: Fortran90 to C (07/12/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
• Bill Blum
  • Re: Chess program in fortran (07/20/04)
• blue mannequin
  • Re: g77 segmentation fault possible error allocating large arrays during runtime (07/29/04)
  • g77 segmentation fault possible error allocating large arrays during runtime (07/27/04)
• Bob Koehler
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/12/04)
• Brian Lepore
  • TIME() (07/17/04)
• bv
  • Re: passing functions or subroutines in a subroutine (07/30/04)
  • Re: uniform random number generator (07/28/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/16/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: how to use 1D array as a multidimensional array (07/10/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: how to use 1D array as a multidimensional array (07/04/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (06/30/04)
• CA
  • Re: calling subroutines (07/13/04)
  • calling subroutines (07/09/04)
• Catherine Rees Lay
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/30/04)
  • Re: [Question:]Difference between PGF90 and Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6 (07/29/04)
  • Re: calling subroutines (07/13/04)
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/13/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/13/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/12/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/12/04)
• Charlie Zender
  • Re: GCC options to mimic Fortran assumptions? (07/12/04)
  • GCC options to mimic Fortran assumptions? (07/11/04)
• Chris
  • xlf90 malloc problem (07/28/04)
• Chuck Stevens
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/13/04)
• Clive Page
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/23/04)
• d
  • compiling f77 code with gfortran (07/20/04)
• Dan Tex1
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/31/04)
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/31/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/07/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/04/04)
  • Re: how to use 1D array as a multidimensional array (07/04/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
• Dan Nagle
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
• Daniel Grimwood
  • Re: IFC 7.1 GenuineIntel check: workaround (07/09/04)
• Dave Seaman
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/12/04)
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/12/04)
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/09/04)
• Dave Thompson
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/21/04)
  • Re: A question about graphic I/O (07/01/04)
  • Re: Specifying at 16-bit integer (07/01/04)
  • Re: allocate... (07/01/04)
• Dave Weatherall
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/22/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/21/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/10/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/08/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/08/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/07/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/05/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/04/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/04/04)
• David Frank
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/31/04)
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/31/04)
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/30/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/29/04)
  • Re: reading files (07/29/04)
  • Re: reading files (07/29/04)
  • Re: reading files (07/28/04)
  • Re: reading files (07/28/04)
  • Re: Fortran and financial calculations (07/27/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/27/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/26/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/25/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/14/04)
• David Grant
  • Re: g77 segmentation fault possible error allocating large arrays during runtime (07/28/04)
• David Ham
  • Re: Allocatable vs pointer in procedure resolution (07/29/04)
  • Re: Allocatable vs pointer in procedure resolution (07/29/04)
  • Re: reading files (07/29/04)
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/27/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/21/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/21/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/21/04)
  • Re: Printf/Write callback! (07/20/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Printf/Write callback! (07/20/04)
  • Re: OT: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/19/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/13/04)
• David J Dachtera
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/11/04)
• David Jones
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/30/04)
• David Sagan
  • Layout in memory (07/31/04)
• David Wade
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/18/04)
• David Young
  • File Reading (07/28/04)
• denis
  • Performance degradation from PGF90-Xeon to Compaq F90-Alpha (07/30/04)
• Dick Hendrickson
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/29/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/29/04)
  • Re: Allocatable vs pointer in procedure resolution (07/29/04)
  • Re: Lahey & Intel compilation size/speed issues (07/29/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/29/04)
  • Re: passing functions or subroutines in a subroutine (07/28/04)
  • Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide (07/26/04)
  • Re: Unfixed number of variables. (07/26/04)
  • Re: allocate / deallocate question (07/23/04)
  • Re: how to use 1D array as a multidimensional array (07/11/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
• Diego Luego
  • Re: Problem: Fortran and OpenMP on Intel Pentium IV 3.0 GHz (Toshiba Laptop) (07/28/04)
  • Re: Problem: Fortran and OpenMP on Intel Pentium IV 3.0 GHz (Toshiba Laptop) (07/16/04)
  • Problem: Fortran and OpenMP on Intel Pentium IV 3.0 GHz (Toshiba Laptop) (07/14/04)
• docdwarf_at_panix.com
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/21/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/20/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/12/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/11/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
• Dr Chaos
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/27/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/27/04)
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/27/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/27/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/17/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/15/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/15/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/15/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/14/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/14/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
  • Re: gfortran daily binaries (06/30/04)
• Dr Ivan D. Reid
  • Re: File Reading (07/28/04)
  • Re: uniform random number generator (07/28/04)
  • Re: unformatted file (07/27/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/16/04)
  • Re: binary file (07/16/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/10/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
• Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
  • Re: free-format printing weirdness with nested implied loop (07/01/04)
  • Re: free-format printing weirdness with nested implied loop (07/01/04)
• Drew McCormack
  • Initialization in modules (07/21/04)
• E. Robert Tisdale
  • Re: GCC options to mimic Fortran assumptions? (07/11/04)
  • Re: UnDead languages? (07/08/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (06/30/04)
• Eric K.
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/17/04)
• Gareth McCaughan
  • Re: What is Dan Tex1's Contribution to NG's (07/06/04)
• Gary L. Scott
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/31/04)
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/30/04)
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/28/04)
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/27/04)
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/27/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/26/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/25/04)
  • Re: visualize images (07/24/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/24/04)
  • Re: visualize images (07/24/04)
  • Re: free graphics library (07/24/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/22/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/17/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/17/04)
  • Re: Extensible Types (07/14/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/13/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: gfortran daily binaries (07/01/04)
• Gary Scott
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/30/04)
  • Extensible Types (07/14/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
• Gary Strand
  • Re: Help :Writing potable unformated files in fortran (07/23/04)
• Gastfreund aus Korinth
  • Fortran and financial calculations (07/27/04)
  • Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/18/04)
• Gerry Thomas
  • Re: "little trouble" with REAL(16) precision (07/22/04)
  • Re: "little trouble" with REAL(16) precision (07/21/04)
  • Re: "little trouble" with REAL(16) precision (07/21/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/20/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Fortran with MS COM(ActiveX DLL) ? (07/14/04)
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/11/04)
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/11/04)
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/11/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/11/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: exporting functions/subs from fortran? (07/07/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/03/04)
  • Re: microsoft express developer tools (07/03/04)
  • What is Dan Tex1's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: exporting functions/subs from fortran? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
• Gib Bogle
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
• glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: passing functions or subroutines in a subroutine (07/30/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/30/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/29/04)
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/29/04)
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/29/04)
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/28/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/27/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/27/04)
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/24/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/22/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/21/04)
  • Re: "little trouble" with REAL(16) precision (07/21/04)
  • Re: Printf/Write callback! (07/20/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/19/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/19/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/16/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/16/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/15/04)
  • Re: Subroutine arguments: arrays vs array slices (07/15/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: Module.Scoping.Subroutine call not initializing variable (07/14/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/13/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/12/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/12/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/12/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/12/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/11/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: calling subroutines (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/07/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/07/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/06/04)
• Greg Lindahl
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/30/04)
• Harald Anlauf
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/27/04)
  • Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/20/04)
  • Re: f2c for Opteron patch under Linux (07/20/04)
  • Re: f2c for Opteron patch under Linux (07/20/04)
  • Re: Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/19/04)
• Harold Stevens
  • Re: OT: Can you say MSoogle? (07/11/04)
• Helge Avlesen
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/14/04)
• Herman D. Knoble
  • Re: Lahey & Intel compilation size/speed issues (07/29/04)
  • Re: "little trouble" with REAL(16) precision (07/21/04)
  • Re: Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/20/04)
  • Re: Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/19/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
  • Re: Eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a general real matrix (07/08/04)
  • Re: IFC 7.1 GenuineIntel check: workaround (07/07/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/02/04)
• Howard Brazee
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
• Håkan Lane
  • Re: Portland Group compiler now F95 (07/22/04)
• Ian Bush
  • Re: Initialization in modules (07/21/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Help for calculating double integral (07/15/04)
  • Re: Allocatable Array of Derived Type crashes (07/14/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/06/04)
• Ian Zimmerman
  • Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide (07/26/04)
• ice
  • Fortran with MS COM(ActiveX DLL) ? (07/14/04)
• Intelli Gence
  • uniform random number generator (07/27/04)
• Ivan Di Piazza
  • Eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a general real matrix (07/08/04)
• J. F. Cornwall
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
• jalev
  • free graphics library (07/24/04)
  • Re: image processing (07/17/04)
  • Re: image processing (07/17/04)
  • binary file (07/16/04)
  • Re: image processing (07/15/04)
• James Cownie
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
• James Giles
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/17/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/16/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/16/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/16/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/16/04)
  • Re: Extensible Types (07/16/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/15/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/14/04)
  • Re: Extensible Types (07/14/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/14/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/14/04)
  • Re: Extensible Types (07/14/04)
  • Re: Extensible Types (07/14/04)
  • Re: Module.Scoping.Subroutine call not initializing variable (07/14/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
  • Re: maxloc/minloc functions (07/08/04)
  • Re: maxloc/minloc functions (07/08/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/04/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
  • Re: Control host association (06/30/04)
• James Van Buskirk
  • Re: passing functions or subroutines in a subroutine (07/30/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/21/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/21/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Pointer function usage (07/18/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/16/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/16/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: calling subroutines (07/13/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/13/04)
  • Re: maxloc/minloc functions (07/08/04)
  • Re: maxloc/minloc functions (07/08/04)
  • Re: optimization of short loops (07/03/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/02/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/02/04)
  • Re: Question about routines with variable number of arguments (07/02/04)
• jan van oosterwijk
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/31/04)
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/30/04)
  • Re: Allocatable vs pointer in procedure resolution (07/29/04)
  • Re: uniform random number generator (07/29/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/18/04)
  • Re: Errata sheet for Metcalf and Reid (07/11/04)
• Jan Vorbrüggen
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/29/04)
  • Re: f90 - Undefined symbol from libfsu.so (07/29/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: creating dll without the need of CVF 6.6 Runtime library (07/28/04)
  • Re: g77 segmentation fault possible error allocating large arrays during runtime (07/27/04)
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/27/04)
  • Re: unformatted file (07/27/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/27/04)
  • Re: newbie question: nag90 and lf95 (07/27/04)
  • Re: random_seed (07/26/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/21/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/20/04)
  • Re: Pointer function usage (07/19/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/19/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/16/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/16/04)
  • Re: Extensible Types (07/16/04)
  • Re: image processing (07/16/04)
  • Re: Extensible Types (07/14/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: calling subroutines (07/13/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/08/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/07/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
• Janne Blomqvist
  • Re: Lahey & Intel compilation size/speed issues (07/30/04)
  • Re: uniform random number generator (07/28/04)
  • Re: compiling f77 code with gfortran (07/20/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/19/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/16/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/12/04)
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/12/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/12/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/09/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/03/04)
  • Re: optimization of short loops (07/03/04)
• JaSeong Ju
  • newbie question: nag90 and lf95 (07/27/04)
• Jason Nielsen
  • Re: Moving from Lahey/IMSL to ifc/pgf90 (07/19/04)
• Jeff D. Hamann
  • Re: exporting functions/subs from fortran? (07/06/04)
• JerryMouse
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
• joel GUERRERO
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/31/04)
  • passing an allocatable matrix in a subroutine to the main program (07/31/04)
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/31/04)
  • How to sort a vector and then append data (07/30/04)
• Joel Smith
  • passing functions or subroutines in a subroutine (07/28/04)
• Johan Franzen
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/03/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/03/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/03/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/02/04)
  • stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/02/04)
• john
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/14/04)
• John Appleyard
  • Re: Chess program in fortran (07/20/04)
  • Re: Chess program in fortran (07/19/04)
• John C. Bollinger
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
• John Harper
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/22/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
• John Lansberry
  • Re: Newbie question (07/13/04)
  • Re: Eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a general real matrix (07/09/04)
• John Wingate
  • Re: TIME() (07/17/04)
  • Re: TIME() (07/17/04)
• Jon
  • Re: reading files (07/29/04)
• Joost VandeVondele
  • Re: Control host association (07/14/04)
• Jose L G?mez Dans
  • Moving from Lahey/IMSL to ifc/pgf90 (07/19/04)
• Joseph Katnic
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/21/04)
• Jugoslav Dujic
  • Re: passing an allocatable matrix in a subroutine to the main program (07/31/04)
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/31/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: creating dll without the need of CVF 6.6 Runtime library (07/31/04)
  • Re: Initialization in modules (07/21/04)
  • Re: Mixed Language Character String (07/20/04)
  • Re: Mixed Language Character String (07/20/04)
  • Re: image processing (07/17/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/14/04)
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/12/04)
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/12/04)
  • Re: how to use 1D array as a multidimensional array (07/10/04)
  • Re: Mixed Language Character String (07/10/04)
  • Re: Can't understand the arguement list. (07/09/04)
  • Re: Mixed Language Character String (07/09/04)
  • Problem with Lapack SGELS* Routines (07/08/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/06/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
• Julian V. Noble
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/20/04)
• Kamaraju Kusumanchi
  • Re: using random_number on a complex array (07/23/04)
  • using random_number on a complex array (07/22/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (06/30/04)
• Keith Thompson
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
• Ken Fairfield
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
• Ken Plotkin
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/18/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/18/04)
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/11/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/04/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/04/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
• Kevin G. Rhoads
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/08/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
• kia
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/31/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • OT: Can you say MSoogle? (07/11/04)
• Klaus Wacker
  • Re: reading files (07/29/04)
  • Re: Fortran and financial calculations (07/27/04)
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/22/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
• Kurda Yon
  • random_seed (07/26/04)
  • Unfixed number of variables. (07/23/04)
• Langhammer
  • Newbie question: creating dll without the need of CVF 6.6 Runtime library (07/27/04)
• Les
  • allocate / deallocate question (07/23/04)
• lurkerBob
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
• LX-i
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
• Marco A. Cruz Q.
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/10/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/09/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (06/30/04)
• Mark
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/13/04)
• Mark Mackey
  • Re: IFC 7.1 GenuineIntel check: workaround (07/08/04)
  • Re: IFC 7.1 GenuineIntel check: workaround (07/08/04)
  • IFC 7.1 GenuineIntel check: workaround (07/07/04)
• Martin Wefald
  • Re: Newbie question: creating dll without the need of CVF 6.6 Runtime library (07/27/04)
• Matthew Nobes
  • .il files (07/09/04)
• Matthias Möller
  • Re: Allocatable Array of Derived Type crashes (07/14/04)
  • Allocatable Array of Derived Type crashes (07/14/04)
• meek_at_skyway.usask.ca
  • RE: uniform random number generator (07/28/04)
  • RE: using random_number on a complex array (07/22/04)
  • RE: FORMAT in F77 (07/22/04)
  • RE: image processing (07/18/04)
  • RE: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/16/04)
  • RE: image processing (07/14/04)
  • RE: Control host association (07/13/04)
• Michael Mattias
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
• Michael Metcalf
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/22/04)
  • Fortran Forum (07/20/04)
  • Re: Pointer function usage (07/19/04)
  • Re: Pointer function usage (07/18/04)
  • Re: binary file (07/16/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Fortran Resources (July 2004) (07/13/04)
  • Re: Errata sheet for Metcalf and Reid (07/11/04)
  • Re: calling subroutines (07/09/04)
  • Dead languages? (07/08/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
• Michael Prager
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/23/04)
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/22/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Standards compliance (HTML) (07/19/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
• Michel OLAGNON
  • Re: how to optimize this stupid subroutine (07/02/04)
• Mike Walters
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
• Mspgrant
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/20/04)
• Nick Maclaren
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/30/04)
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/29/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/14/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
• Nicolas Lardjane
  • Re: passing functions or subroutines in a subroutine (07/30/04)
  • Re: [Question:]Difference between PGF90 and Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6 (07/30/04)
• Nigel Barker
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/12/04)
• Nitesh
  • Re: Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/20/04)
  • Reading Little-Endian Binary File in Fortran90 (07/19/04)
• nye-2_at_medctr.osu.edu
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/12/04)
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/12/04)
  • Newbie question...definition issues. (07/09/04)
• Pablo
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
• Paul M. Mather
  • Re: image processing (07/17/04)
  • Re: image processing (07/16/04)
  • Re: image processing (07/16/04)
• Paul Van Delst
  • Re: How to sort a vector and then append data (07/30/04)
  • Question about DATA statement initialisation in a module (07/30/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/29/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/29/04)
  • Re: File Reading (07/28/04)
  • Re: Problem: Fortran and OpenMP on Intel Pentium IV 3.0 GHz (Toshiba Laptop) (07/28/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/27/04)
  • Re: Help :Writing potable unformated files in fortran (07/23/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Question about routines with variable number of arguments (07/02/04)
  • Re: Question about routines with variable number of arguments (07/02/04)
  • Question about routines with variable number of arguments (07/02/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
• Peoter Veliki
  • static variables in fortran77? (07/08/04)
• pervinder
  • f90 - Undefined symbol from libfsu.so (07/29/04)
• PetitTrot
  • Re: microsoft express developer tools (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
• pgx_at_pgrahams.com
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
• Pierre Asselin
  • Re: passing functions or subroutines in a subroutine (07/30/04)
• Prof. Athanasios Migdalas
  • Re: Fortran90 to C (07/03/04)
• Qianqian Fang
  • Re: optimization of short loops (07/04/04)
  • optimization of short loops (07/03/04)
  • f90 module variable scope and interactions with OpenMP (07/01/04)
• r08n
  • Re: passing functions or subroutines in a subroutine (07/30/04)
  • Re: Allocatable vs pointer in procedure resolution (07/30/04)
  • Subroutine arguments: arrays vs array slices (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/09/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/07/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/05/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
• rand
  • tutorial of fortran (07/31/04)
  • Re: reading files (07/28/04)
  • reading files (07/28/04)
  • unformatted file (07/27/04)
  • visualize images (07/24/04)
• Ray Koopman
  • Re: Accuracy of tan()? (07/02/04)
• Rich Townsend
  • Re: Allocatable vs pointer in procedure resolution (07/30/04)
  • Allocatable vs pointer in procedure resolution (07/29/04)
  • Re: Lahey & Intel compilation size/speed issues (07/29/04)
  • Re: g77 segmentation fault possible error allocating large arrays during runtime (07/29/04)
  • Lahey & Intel compilation size/speed issues (07/29/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/13/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/08/04)
• Richard
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/12/04)
• Richard Edgar
  • Re: passing functions or subroutines in a subroutine (07/30/04)
  • Re: Help :Writing potable unformated files in fortran (07/23/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/22/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/21/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/21/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
• Richard Felkins
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/19/04)
  • Precision issue? (07/16/04)
• Richard Maine
  • Re: Standards interpretation: interface and intent? (07/21/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/19/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/19/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
  • Re: Pointer function usage (07/19/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/16/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/15/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: Extensible Types (07/14/04)
  • Re: Module.Scoping.Subroutine call not initializing variable (07/14/04)
  • Re: Extensible Types (07/14/04)
  • Re: close(status=delete) on a missing file (07/13/04)
  • Re: Allocatable components (07/13/04)
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/13/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/13/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/13/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/12/04)
  • Re: Newbie question...definition issues. (07/12/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/09/04)
  • Re: calling subroutines (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
  • Re: maxloc/minloc functions (07/08/04)
  • Re: static variables in fortran77? (07/08/04)
  • Re: static variables in fortran77? (07/08/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/07/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/07/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/07/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/07/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/06/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/06/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/06/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/05/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/04/04)
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/03/04)
  • Re: Fortran90 to C (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/02/04)
  • Re: Question about routines with variable number of arguments (07/02/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/02/04)
  • Re: Question about routines with variable number of arguments (07/02/04)
  • Re: howto optimize this stupid subroutine (07/02/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/01/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (06/30/04)
• rih5342
  • Re: Mixed Language Character String (07/20/04)
  • Re: Mixed Language Character String (07/20/04)
  • Re: Mixed Language Character String (07/19/04)
  • Re: Mixed Language Character String (07/09/04)
  • Mixed Language Character String (07/09/04)
  • Re: Mixed Language DLL (07/07/04)
  • Re: Mixed Language DLL (07/01/04)
• Rob Chambers
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/07/04)
  • g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/06/04)
• Robert Corbett
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/31/04)
  • Re: f90 - Undefined symbol from libfsu.so (07/30/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/30/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/30/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/29/04)
  • Re: Sun f90 bad optimization for assumed-shape array (07/24/04)
  • Dynamically allocated common (07/02/04)
• Robert Wagner
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/11/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/11/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
• robin
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/29/04)
• Robin Haunschild
  • AMD64 fortran and precision (07/19/04)
• Roger Williams
  • Re: free graphics library (07/25/04)
• Ron Shepard
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/03/04)
• Roy Lewallen
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/11/04)
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/11/04)
  • Re: XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/09/04)
  • XP Pro - CVF permission problem (07/09/04)
• Salvatore Filippone
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/20/04)
• Sanjay Vohra
  • Module.Scoping.Subroutine call not initializing variable (07/14/04)
• seema
  • Newbie question (07/13/04)
• Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: [Question:]How to split one file into 3/4 using fortran? (07/29/04)
• Simon Geard
  • Re: Problems with intel fortran compiler version 8 (07/04/04)
• Simon Lee
  • Help for calculating double integral (07/15/04)
• Skip
  • Re: GCC options to mimic Fortran assumptions? (07/13/04)
• somebody intelligent
  • Re: uniform random number generator (07/28/04)
• Stephen Fuld
  • Re: C objects [was Re: Is Itanium the first 64-bit casualty?] (07/31/04)
• Steve Lionel
  • Re: Problem: Fortran and OpenMP on Intel Pentium IV 3.0 GHz (Toshiba Laptop) (07/28/04)
  • Re: "little trouble" with REAL(16) precision (07/21/04)
  • Re: "little trouble" with REAL(16) precision (07/21/04)
  • Re: Problem: Fortran and OpenMP on Intel Pentium IV 3.0 GHz (Toshiba Laptop) (07/16/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/14/04)
  • Re: .il files (07/09/04)
  • Re: IFC 7.1 GenuineIntel check: workaround (07/07/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/06/04)
  • Re: Question about routines with variable number of arguments (07/02/04)
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/02/04)
• Steven G. Kargl
  • Re: Unfixed number of variables. (07/26/04)
  • Re: using random_number on a complex array (07/23/04)
  • Re: compiling f77 code with gfortran (07/20/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Re: Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Conformance question involving equivalence (07/14/04)
  • Errata sheet for Metcalf and Reid (07/11/04)
  • Re: static variables in fortran77? (07/08/04)
  • Re: gfortran daily binaries (06/30/04)
• tachyon
  • Re: maxloc/minloc functions (07/08/04)
  • Re: maxloc/minloc functions (07/08/04)
  • maxloc/minloc functions (07/08/04)
• This
  • If you just feel like fucking with Homer Simpson (07/19/04)
• tholen_at_antispam.ham
  • Re: stack overflow with reshape and transpose (07/02/04)
• Thomas
  • fortran equivalent to Matlab sparse matrix (07/01/04)
• Tim Prince
  • Re: [Question:]Difference between PGF90 and Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6 (07/25/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/22/04)
  • Re: AMD64 fortran and precision (07/20/04)
  • Re: Precision issue? (07/20/04)
  • Re: TIME() (07/17/04)
  • Re: GCC options to mimic Fortran assumptions? (07/11/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/09/04)
  • Re: g77 linker "multiple definition" errors (07/07/04)
• TimC
  • Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide (07/26/04)
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/24/04)
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/23/04)
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/23/04)
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/22/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/21/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Standards compliance (HTML) (07/20/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/13/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/06/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/06/04)
• Tobias Schlueter
  • Re: difference between g95 and gfortran (07/08/04)
• Tom
  • Re: Newbie question: Why Fortran? (07/19/04)
• Tom Gederberg
  • Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/14/04)
• Toon Moene
  • Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide (07/26/04)
  • Re: Initializing Multi-dimensional array in Fortran 90 Module (07/15/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/13/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/12/04)
  • Re: First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/12/04)
  • First Fortran program vectorized with experimental version of GNU Fortran. (07/12/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/11/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/10/04)
  • Re: Dead languages? (07/08/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/02/04)
  • Re: Control host association (07/02/04)
  • Re: gfortran daily binaries (06/30/04)
• Victor Eijkhout
  • Re: What is Gerry Thomas's Contribution to NG's (07/03/04)
• Walter Spector
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/23/04)
  • Re: using random_number on a complex array (07/23/04)
  • Re: FORMAT in F77 (07/23/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/12/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/03/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/02/04)
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/01/04)
• Weisberg
  • Re: What can be done in FORTRAN that cannot be done in C/C++? (07/08/04)
• Winston
  • Fortran90 to C (07/03/04)
• wkpark
  • f2c for Opteron patch under Linux (07/20/04)
• Wolfgang
  • Re: Fortran90 to C (07/12/04)
• Won Kyu Park
  • Re: f2c for Opteron patch under Linux (07/20/04)
• yogel
  • image processing (07/14/04)
• zeman_at_netvisao.pt
  • Re: "little trouble" with REAL(16) precision (07/22/04)
  • "little trouble" with REAL(16) precision (07/21/04)

Last message date: 07/31/04
Archived on: 07/31/04 CEST

---

876 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(17)