Re: A question for the developers of g95
From: Ron Shepard (ron-shepard_at_NOSPAM.comcast.net)
Date: 08/11/04
- Next message: Richard Maine: "Re: A question for the developers of g95"
- Previous message: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: how to get an allocatable array outside of a subroutine"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Madhusudan Singh: "Re: A question for the developers of g95"
- Next in thread: Richard Maine: "Re: A question for the developers of g95"
- Reply: Richard Maine: "Re: A question for the developers of g95"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:43:56 -0500
In article <2ntq20F4nsn8U1@uni-berlin.de>,
Madhusudan Singh <spammers-go-here@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hasn't the POSIX.9 standard (1003.9-1992) been withdrawn ?
I don't know. Is there a web site that would allow the current
status of the various standards to be determined?
$.02 -Ron Shepard
- Next message: Richard Maine: "Re: A question for the developers of g95"
- Previous message: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: how to get an allocatable array outside of a subroutine"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Madhusudan Singh: "Re: A question for the developers of g95"
- Next in thread: Richard Maine: "Re: A question for the developers of g95"
- Reply: Richard Maine: "Re: A question for the developers of g95"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Loading