Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453272
From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: *** Hertz (Hey, who's *** Hertz?): "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453272"
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Next in thread: *** Hertz (Hey, who's *** Hertz?): "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453272"
- Reply: *** Hertz (Hey, who's *** Hertz?): "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453272"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 23 Sep 2004 19:52:23 -0700
tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<NtA4d.17535$OB2.8052@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> Today's Sandman digest:
>
> 366> Irrelevant. The statement in question is "This will be my last rtesponse". You
> 365> wrote that, not I. As expected, it wasn't your last "rtesponse" [sic].
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 365> You're erroneously presupposing that "This will be my last rtesponse"
> 365> is a statement of mine.
>
> Message-ID: <mr-0909001318140001@196.0.0.1>
'ere, wot's all this then, bruce?
- Next message: *** Hertz (Hey, who's *** Hertz?): "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453272"
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Next in thread: *** Hertz (Hey, who's *** Hertz?): "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453272"
- Reply: *** Hertz (Hey, who's *** Hertz?): "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453272"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]