Re: KIND related issues on NAGware f95 v 4.1
From: Richard E Maine (nospam_at_see.signature)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: Madhusudan Singh: "Re: KIND related issues on NAGware f95 v 4.1"
- Previous message: Daniel Grimwood: "Re: Avoiding compilation cascades"
- In reply to: Madhusudan Singh: "Re: KIND related issues on NAGware f95 v 4.1"
- Next in thread: Madhusudan Singh: "Re: KIND related issues on NAGware f95 v 4.1"
- Reply: Madhusudan Singh: "Re: KIND related issues on NAGware f95 v 4.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 27 Sep 2004 16:04:49 -0700
Madhusudan Singh <spammers-go-here@spam.invalid> writes:
> That is right. Quad precision is being used in one part of my code. EULER is
> just being defined as quad as it is used there.
Note that Euler is *NOT* defined as quad in the code you showed. Namely
> REAL(DP), PARAMETER :: EULER=0.5772156649015328606065120900824024310422_qp
The real(DP) bit defines it as of kind DP. The _qp used in the value
does *NOT* change that. Instead it just means that, after going to
the trouble of writing a quad value, you then tell the compiler to
convert it to double.
That's what Paul was talking about. (Though I'm not Paul, I'm
quite confident of that.)
-- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; email: my first.last at org.domain | experience comes from bad judgment. org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain
- Next message: Madhusudan Singh: "Re: KIND related issues on NAGware f95 v 4.1"
- Previous message: Daniel Grimwood: "Re: Avoiding compilation cascades"
- In reply to: Madhusudan Singh: "Re: KIND related issues on NAGware f95 v 4.1"
- Next in thread: Madhusudan Singh: "Re: KIND related issues on NAGware f95 v 4.1"
- Reply: Madhusudan Singh: "Re: KIND related issues on NAGware f95 v 4.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|