Re: a history question
From: Arjen Markus (arjen.markus_at_wldelft.nl)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Richard Edgar: "Re: a history question"
- Previous message: Martin O'Brien: "Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261"
- In reply to: Richard Edgar: "Re: a history question"
- Next in thread: Richard Edgar: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Richard Edgar: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Paul Van Delst: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Richard E Maine: "Re: a history question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:45:44 +0200
Richard Edgar wrote:
>
>
> I'm not certain of the answer to either question - although I very much
> doubt that the second one is possible, given that as things stand I have
> to reimplement a linked list for every new datatype.
>
> Richard
Ah, that is not quite true: I have built a small library for dealing
with
trees. I can store any data type in the nodes of these trees. The trick
is
to use the not-so-well-known intrinsic function transfer().
Regards,
Arjen
- Next message: Richard Edgar: "Re: a history question"
- Previous message: Martin O'Brien: "Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261"
- In reply to: Richard Edgar: "Re: a history question"
- Next in thread: Richard Edgar: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Richard Edgar: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Paul Van Delst: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Richard E Maine: "Re: a history question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]