Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278"
- Previous message: Dr.Matt: "Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Sep 2004 21:50:24 -0700
tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<NMF6d.18$z04.12@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> grantco writes:
>
> >>>>>> Yes, this is the same person who claimed that he was going to leave the
> >>>>>> newsgroup because he found it so depressing. After another 116 postings
> >>>>>> in the newsgroup, he decided it was time to drag me into his little world
> >>>>>> again, making a fool of himself in the process.
>
> >>>>> Well, at least he's not alone, Tholen.
>
> >>>> Well, I see that you've turned to stalking, grantco. That makes you
> >>>> a fool to go with Bass.
>
> >>> Define "stalking" Tholen.
>
> >> Unnecessary, given that the dictionary has already done so, grantco.
>
> > Perhaps you should look it up then, Tholen.
>
> Perhaps not, grantco.
>
> > Obviously you knoweth not of what you speak...
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> If you do not want your petty bickerings
> >>> commented upon, perhaps the wiser plan would be not to write them?
>
> >> Non sequitur, given that I said nothing about the occurrence of
> >> your comments, grantco., but you are erroneously presupposing the
> >> existence of some "petty bickerings" from me.
>
> > ALL your posts are petty bickering, Tholen...
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>> Now you won't need to feel you are the ONLY fool around here,
> >>>>> Tholen....
>
> >>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> >>>> argument. Getting pretty desperate, grantco, following me around
> >>>> to other newsgroups.
>
> >>> This was posted in rec.music.classical, numb nuts.
>
> >> Liar:
> >>
> >> ] From: grantco@greenbaynet.com (grantco)
> >> ] Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
> >> ] Subject: Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
> >> ] Date: 24 Sep 2004 11:32:39 -0700
> >> ] Message-ID: <b51015e1.0409241032.67f91613@posting.google.com
>
> Note: no response.
>
> >>> I didn't put it here.
>
> >> Liar:
> >>
> >> ] From: grantco@greenbaynet.com (grantco)
> >> ] Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
> >> ] Subject: Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
> >> ] Date: 24 Sep 2004 11:32:39 -0700
> >> ] Message-ID: <b51015e1.0409241032.67f91613@posting.google.com
>
> > Yup.
>
> Glad to see you admit to being a liar, grantco.
>
> > In rec.music.classical it shows that this thread and the
> > following posts are going into comp.os.os2.advocacy BUT they are
> > listed and posted at rec.music.classical.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Perhaps if you weren't too
> > LAZY to look for yourself you'd know that before making empty
> > accusations.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> > You flatter yourself by thinking I'd actually BOTHER to look for your
> > posts to comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that it is necessary to think, grantco.
>
> > This thread is appearing in rec.music.classical.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > At least it does if you are reading rec.music.classical through
> > google.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Obviously you don't even know where you are writing any more...
>
> >> Non sequitur, given that I was not referring to what I wrote, but rather
> >> what you wrote, grantco.
>
> > Completely relevant, numb nutz. What you are writing in this thread IS
> > for a FACT appearing in rec.music.classical.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > I didn't bring it there.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that it's appearing there, grantco.
>
> > Again, obviously you don't even know WHERE you are writing anymore.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming
> from someone who doesn't know where he's writing.
>
> > Of course I know you will be too lazy to disprove my claim...
>
> You're the one who made the claim, grantco, therefore the burden of
> proof falls on your shoulders, not mine.
but I don't like spam, bruce.
- Next message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278"
- Previous message: Dr.Matt: "Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
