Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!

From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 10/01/04

  • Next message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!" 
    Date: 1 Oct 2004 00:02:51 -0700

    tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<9A_6d.1047$z04.956@twister.socal.rr.com>...
    > grantco writes:
    >
    > >>>>>>>> Yes, this is the same person who claimed that he was going to leave the
    > >>>>>>>> newsgroup because he found it so depressing. After another 116 postings
    > >>>>>>>> in the newsgroup, he decided it was time to drag me into his little world
    > >>>>>>>> again, making a fool of himself in the process.
    >
    > >>>>>>> Well, at least he's not alone, Tholen.
    >
    > >>>>>> Well, I see that you've turned to stalking, grantco. That makes you
    > >>>>>> a fool to go with Bass.
    >
    > >>>>> Define "stalking" Tholen.
    >
    > >>>> Unnecessary, given that the dictionary has already done so, grantco.
    >
    > >>> Perhaps you should look it up then, Tholen.
    >
    > >> Perhaps not, grantco.
    >
    > Note: no response.
    >
    > >>> Obviously you knoweth not of what you speak...
    >
    > >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > Note: no response.
    >
    > >>>>> If you do not want your petty bickerings
    > >>>>> commented upon, perhaps the wiser plan would be not to write them?
    >
    > >>>> Non sequitur, given that I said nothing about the occurrence of
    > >>>> your comments, grantco., but you are erroneously presupposing the
    > >>>> existence of some "petty bickerings" from me.
    >
    > >>> ALL your posts are petty bickering, Tholen...
    >
    > >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > Note: no response.
    >
    > >>>>>>> Now you won't need to feel you are the ONLY fool around here,
    > >>>>>>> Tholen....
    >
    > >>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    > >>>>>> argument. Getting pretty desperate, grantco, following me around
    > >>>>>> to other newsgroups.
    >
    > >>>>> This was posted in rec.music.classical, numb nuts.
    >
    > >>>> Liar:
    > >>>>
    > >>>> ] From: grantco@greenbaynet.com (grantco)
    > >>>> ] Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    > >>>> ] Subject: Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
    > >>>> ] Date: 24 Sep 2004 11:32:39 -0700
    > >>>> ] Message-ID: <b51015e1.0409241032.67f91613@posting.google.com
    >
    > >> Note: no response.
    >
    > > No response necessary.
    >
    > Classic rationalization of your evasion, grantco.
    >
    > >>>>> I didn't put it here.
    >
    > >>>> Liar:
    > >>>>
    > >>>> ] From: grantco@greenbaynet.com (grantco)
    > >>>> ] Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    > >>>> ] Subject: Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
    > >>>> ] Date: 24 Sep 2004 11:32:39 -0700
    > >>>> ] Message-ID: <b51015e1.0409241032.67f91613@posting.google.com
    >
    > >>> Yup.
    >
    > >> Glad to see you admit to being a liar, grantco.
    >
    > > Ah, there's that playground logic again...
    >
    > Classic erroneous presupposition of "playground logic". Rather
    > ironic, coming from someone pretending that he's posting in a
    > different newsgroup.
    >
    > >>> In rec.music.classical it shows that this thread and the
    > >>> following posts are going into comp.os.os2.advocacy BUT they are
    > >>> listed and posted at rec.music.classical.
    >
    > >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > Note: no response.
    >
    > >>> Perhaps if you weren't too
    > >>> LAZY to look for yourself you'd know that before making empty
    > >>> accusations.
    >
    > >> Classic erroneous presupposition.
    >
    > > Go to google.
    >
    > Unnecessary, grantco.
    >
    > > Go to groups.
    >
    > Unnecessary, grantco.
    >
    > > Go to rec.music.classical.
    >
    > Unnecessary, grantco.
    >
    > > Its there.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > > If this is too much for you to do, then you are LAZY.
    >
    > How ironic, coming from the person too lazy to present any header.
    > Meanwhile, I presented a header above, demonstrating that you're
    > posting only to comp.os.os2.advocacy, grantco.
    >
    > >>> You flatter yourself by thinking I'd actually BOTHER to look for your
    > >>> posts to comp.os.os2.advocacy.
    >
    > >> You're erroneously presupposing that it is necessary to think, grantco.
    >
    > Note: no response.
    >
    > >>> This thread is appearing in rec.music.classical.
    >
    > >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > Note: no response.
    >
    > >>> At least it does if you are reading rec.music.classical through
    > >>> google.
    >
    > >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > > No need to substantiate.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > > Look for yourself.
    >
    > Unnecessary, grantco.
    >
    > > Its very simple, Tholen. Even YOU could figure it out.
    >
    > You're erroneously presupposing that I didn't figure out that you've
    > been stalking me as soon as I saw your first posting show up in
    > solely in comp.os.os2.advocacy, grantco. Rather ironic, coming from
    > someone who still hasn't figured it out.
    >
    > >>>>> Obviously you don't even know where you are writing any more...
    >
    > >>>> Non sequitur, given that I was not referring to what I wrote, but rather
    > >>>> what you wrote, grantco.
    >
    > >>> Completely relevant, numb nutz. What you are writing in this thread IS
    > >>> for a FACT appearing in rec.music.classical.
    >
    > >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > Note: no response.
    >
    > >>> I didn't bring it there.
    >
    > >> You're erroneously presupposing that it's appearing there, grantco.
    >
    > > It is.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > > Simple as that, Tholen...
    >
    > On what basis do you call it simple, grantco? You still haven't
    > figured it out.
    >
    > >>> Again, obviously you don't even know WHERE you are writing anymore.
    >
    > >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming
    > >> from someone who doesn't know where he's writing.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > >>> Of course I know you will be too lazy to disprove my claim...
    >
    > >> You're the one who made the claim, grantco, therefore the burden of
    > >> proof falls on your shoulders, not mine.
    >
    > > All that you wrote above is completely BOGUS, Tholen.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > > This thread,
    > > your post and mine are ALL appearing at rec.music.progressive.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Interesting change in
    > your claim, however.

    I banged me gavel. I did me 'silence in court' bit. Ooh! If looks could kill
    that prosecuting counsel would be in for thirty years, bruce.

  • Next message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
      ... > Note: no response. ... > Classic rationalization of your evasion, grantco. ... > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ... > posting only to comp.os.os2.advocacy, ...
      (sci.astro)
    • Re: digest 2453240
      ... > Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco. ... The facts state otherwise, Tholen. ... > Note: no response. ... > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ...
      (sci.astro)
    • Re: digest 2453240
      ... > Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco. ... The facts state otherwise, Tholen. ... > Note: no response. ... > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ...
      (sci.astro)
    • Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
      ... > A question is a response, grantco. ... > Irrelevant, grantco, given that I never said it wasn't a response. ... > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ... > Or rec.music.progressive, for that matter. ...
      (comp.lang.fortran)
    • Re: digest 2453240
      ... >>The facts state otherwise, Tholen. ... > Where do the facts allegedly state that I see a similarity to ... > Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, grantco? ... >>Yes, your response is, Tholen. ...
      (sci.astro)