Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis
From: Dan Tex1 (dantex1_at_aol.com)
Date: 10/02/04
- Next message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO'"
- Previous message: tweet: "Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?"
- In reply to: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis"
- Next in thread: Ken Plotkin: "Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis"
- Reply: Ken Plotkin: "Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 02 Oct 2004 18:39:54 GMT
From: "Gerry Thomas" gfthomas@sympatico.ca
>"Michael" <mwh_acs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:BD83BC6C.23473%mwh_acs@hotmail.com...
>> On 29/9/04 5:13 pm, in article
>> cjemus$a0k$1@fb04373.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de, "Peter Spellucci"
>> <spellucci@fb04373.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > In article <1096468852.988859.208300@k17g2000odb.googlegroups.com>,
>> > mdi00@hotmail.com writes:
>> >> Is there a book of numerical recipes which makes use of object
>> >> oriented programming in C++? The classic "Numerical Recipes in
>> >> C++" hardly makes any use of C++'s OO capabilities, and other
>> >> books I've come across only make very limited use of them.
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Marco
>> >>
>> >
>> > maybe Daoqi Yang: C++ and object oriented numeric computing
>> > springer publisher 2001, ISBN 0-387-98990-0
>> > is of the intended type
>> > hth
>> > peter
>>
>> Barton & Nackman 'Scientific & Engineering C++' is pretty old but has
>lots
>> of good ideas.
>
>Agreed, except it's no longer in print and it's a pain trying to renew it
>at the lib. It remains the finest indicment of Fortran as the language of
>yesteryerar whatever its vintage, F2003 included.
>
>--
>You're Welcome,
>Gerry T.
Gerry certainly spends a lot of time in clf and attempting to degrade Fortran
and those who use it ( for no apparent or logical reason ). Seems a bit like
an insecurity to me. Hmmm. I wonder if he wears shoes that are a few sizes
too big also?
Dan :-)
- Next message: Lady Chatterly: "Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO'"
- Previous message: tweet: "Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?"
- In reply to: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis"
- Next in thread: Ken Plotkin: "Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis"
- Reply: Ken Plotkin: "Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|